NikeBG said:
Gidos especially could work well, and even an
Andronikos Gidos, whom we can count as his brother or son f.e.
Yep, the whole deal around Andronikos Gidos confused me, since I thought that he and Alexios Gidos were the same person!
Then I thought that Alexios Komnenos (Andronikos Gidos' father-in-law), was, in fact ''my'' Alexios Gidos (since I didn't know whether Gidos is a nickname or a last name), but then I read that Alexios Komenos was born around 1180, and since we know that Alexios Gidos was leading an army in 1183, it was not possible.
(fu*king, damnit, am I crazy, or are 90% of Byzantine nobility called Alexios, Andronikos or Theodoros!?)
Now, you were suggesting that Alexios Gidos and Andronikos Gidos were either father and son, or brothers.
I think they were probably father and son, since Alexios Komnenos was born in around 1180, and if he really was a father-in-law to Alexios Gidos, that means he was (obviously) born
before him, which in turn fits more into theory that Andronikos Gidos is Alexios Gidos' son.
Now, concerning their
titles...
Padiates was only mentioned leading an army, so we don't know his title.
Lampardas was mentioned in the year as being
one of the two experienced military commanders [with Alexios Branas]
from the time of Emperor Manuel (died in 1180). That means he was active before 1183, when his name was written.
Gidos, on the other hand, was mentioned as being
Grand Domesticus Marshall of the West (?!).
I have absolutely no idea what that means, but it is possible there's been a translation error (as I said, the book was translated from Czech to Serbian).
The full text reads:
...
наиђоше крсташи на византијске трупе под заповедништвом великога доместика маршала запада Алексија Гида и Манојла Камица, које беху опремљене против Срба.
eng:
...the Crusaders came upon the Byzantine troops, under the command of the grand domesticus marshall(s) of the west, Alexios Gidos and Manuel Kamytzes, who were equipped for fighting against the Serbs.
Now, I will not bother you with the rules of the Serbian language, but, believe it or not, 3 things are possible to interpret:
1. That Gidos was the Grand Domesticus, while Kamytzes was the Marshall of the West
2. That Gidos was the Grand Domesticus Marshall of the West
3. That Gidos was the Grand Domesticus of the Marshalls of the West (i.e. he was the leader of the Marshalls of the West).
EDIT: in fact, it seems to me that number 3 is correct, at least according to the bult of the sentence.
Now, concerning Padiates' age (or whether he was alive in 1200), I'd say it is possible, since there were a lot of XII century people who lived long lives: Duke Henry the Lion (1129-1195), Prince Miroslav (before 1113-1196 or 1199), Grand Prince Stefan Nemanja (1113-1999 or 1200), Doge Enrico Dandolo (c.1107-1205), Eleanor of Aquitaine (1122 or 1124 - 1204)...
NikeBG said:
Nope, none of those are on the list.
None of them, you say?
Great!
Knowing that makes me sad that I don't know (very well) any other languages, except Serbian and English.
For example, I believe there is a lot of interesting info (concerning the Serbs) to be found in Greek, Bulgarian and other foreign historical books, that is usually not found in Serbian books.
Other way around too - who knows if that Theodoros Padiates, for example, is at all being mentioned in standard Greek history books, because of his (seemingly) low importance?
But he is mentioned in a book about the Serbs, because he led an army towards Ras (possibly never attacking it) - a feat that is sure to be omitted from a Greek book because... well, it serves no purpose, actually.
And it makes sense really - the standard history books don't deal much with ''smaller characters'' from history, that had no impact on its course...
Ironically, those are the people that we need the most, especially when adding lords for any faction.