Tiberius said:Swadia 4 lyfe.
The true owners of Calradia. Lion throne? Bah, they have enough territory already. Laurians? I like their style, but they are mere invaders. Vaegirs and Ormeli? LOL. Imperials? Too many guns but not enough heart.
Ormeli have something that makes them strong though. Maybe SHIELDS unlke my troops who have no protection whatsoever.
Seriously, no shields? Nothing? nada?
RaVeN said:Tiberius said:Swadia 4 lyfe.
The true owners of Calradia. Lion throne? Bah, they have enough territory already. Laurians? I like their style, but they are mere invaders. Vaegirs and Ormeli? LOL. Imperials? Too many guns but not enough heart.
Ormeli have something that makes them strong though. Maybe SHIELDS unlke my troops who have no protection whatsoever.
Seriously, no shields? Nothing? nada?
4 lyfe?
So you're telling me that Swadians and their surbordinates are black people?
Lord Kehm said:Especially when it comes to defending castles, damn those Laurians and their pikes.
Lord Kehm said:Imperial State all the way. Those who use Gunpowder to it's fullest potential are the masters of Calradia.
The age of the warrior is dying out one shot at a time.
My second choice would be the Laurians, though they aren't as smart as the Imperials when it comes to gunpowder, their tactics in warfare make them a worthy adversary. Especially when it comes to defending castles, damn those Laurians and their pikes.
Tiberius said:Lord Kehm said:Imperial State all the way. Those who use Gunpowder to it's fullest potential are the masters of Calradia.
The age of the warrior is dying out one shot at a time.
My second choice would be the Laurians, though they aren't as smart as the Imperials when it comes to gunpowder, their tactics in warfare make them a worthy adversary. Especially when it comes to defending castles, damn those Laurians and their pikes.
Too bad they get owned so easily with a good force of knights on an open field or by infantry during sieges.
I'll stick with swadia.
Tiberius said:Exactly. If the AI used actual tactics they would be much more of a challenge.
There isn't a lot of thing you can do in a siege though.
Zenightmare said:Tiberius said:Exactly. If the AI used actual tactics they would be much more of a challenge.
There isn't a lot of thing you can do in a siege though.
One way to take a castle find a handcannon run up the ladder and blow the ones blocking all your lovely troops up you roughly take 8-10 depending how bulked up they are and it allows your troops to get on the walls even if its only a little bit >.>
Hmm To detroy the theory that the AI need tactics, get 60 repeaters If you can afford them find a nice hill sit on top of there 3/4 or whats coming to you would be target practise :3
Imperial states is the strongest faction due to this ^_^
fifer71 said:I have to say the AI does everything wrong with the Imperial state. Just take part in a battle with the AI running your allies in a battle and watch them charge towards enemy cavalry then spread out and get destroyed. While I sit on my hill not moving. The only thing I would like the State to do is have the ability to form square but I can only dream
1x1General1x1 said:I love the Laurians, a mass of veteran pike men and sword&buckler men owns all. I've beaten armies of the swadians that out numbered my troops 3 to 1. If I have to fight imperial state then I go heavy sword&buckler men. I actually like the free pike men you can get from towns, in case I suffer heavy casualties. I have to say that I really don't like the imperial state, no offense to anyone who likes them but, I like having the ability to actually siege something.
General OUT!!!!