Search results for query: *

Man's got a point, the female models are intentionally hideous.

On a sidenote, Warband Multiplayer is more alive then ever before.

How the hell do you bake a cake perfectly the first time and then screw up majorly the second time? It feels like the game has been made by people who have never actually even played Warband.

Klebari said:

First and foremost on our list of improvements is stability. We are working very hard to ensure that you have a smooth experience that is free of technical difficulties and server crashes. We have addressed many issues in recent patches and will continue to do so until stability reaches a point that we are satisfied with.

Click to expand...

Implying that stability is some sort of major issue right now, it absolutely isn't, MP has been relatively stable ever since launch. There are a lot more major issues that need addressing, namely the complete lack of multiplayer content, non existent community servers, deplorable combat system and terrible balancing.

I'm afraid that by the point you become "satisfied" with multiplayer stability it will be completely dead in the first place, set your priorities straight.

Davos141 said:

agreed need to make them less accurate

Click to expand...

I enjoyed your 30 sub special

Maybe they'll add it, maybe they wont, we'll just have to wait a couple of years and see.

The element to be actually good at the game has been completely removed.

Combat system is good for those who like to spam and backpedal with broken and unbalanced weapons in siege like OP, quite evident from his K/D and amount of played games and his own statements, if OP was playing 6v6 skrims instead, he'd be making a thread on how bad the combat is and how it is super unfair for new players.

Slapping early access on it and using it as an excuse to all the braindead decision making is pathetic.

Antrix32 said:

There is a large difference between their resources being devoted to the Single Player, the primary appeal of the games and what draws in most players, and not caring about Multiplayer. I have no doubt there will be a stronger focus on fixing multiplayer issues once single player is in a stable, working-as-intended state. Unsurprisingly, game devs want people to like every part of their game but anyone who has played the sseries for a while has to understand that their focus will always be single player first.

On the positive side, the ridiculous sales of the game could mean a expansion of their dev team.

Click to expand...

Considering this statement, it is absolutely not an excuse to completely neglect MP. A few devs (in single digits) would be enough in a multiplayer focused team to actually work on balancing the game and including simple new features considering there is a plethora of feedback to cling on to. Singleplayer in the current state of the game might be the key point, but even then it feels like a complete wasteland and most of it feels like a big placeholder, as dead as native Warband was, which makes me wonder how it can be so when all of their focus is on this aspect. The most dedicated people in this community who actually care about issues are modders and the multiplayer community and both of these groups are basically given half a year timers until their concerns are finally addressed.

Antrix32 said:

Source on the "they said it themselves"? Its completely clear that their priority is Singleplayer, for obvious reasons, but I've never heard them say they don't care about MP.

Click to expand...

If you look up some of Callums posts you would see that they explicitly state that they do not have the smallest amounts of resources to spare for MP, they can't even spare time to implement a simple ELO system, which could literally just be gaining or losing points from a set basis to que up with players of similar skill level, it is quite evident and as I said, TW repeat themselves over and over saying that they are not sparing any work at all on MP, saying they don't care is my personal input based on TW statements, saying they have no idea when they'll work on it and are not working on it is the source material.

TW doesn't care about MP, they said it themselves, they have no idea when they'll be focusing work on it. It's a bare bones broken mess and it is absolutely appalling to see the current state of it after 8 whole years of development and a year or so of beta testing, it almost feels as if it was completely neglected.

DaN_CZ said:

Literally everything you ask is in the topic description.

Click to expand...

Neither of my questions are answered, and nor was I asking you -snip-.

Why not keep the name Persistent Kingdoms? Also I assume this will only be released after community servers?

Shields should be majorly nerfed in general, they take way too much effort to break, which in return reduces infantry killing power dramatically.

See the problem is, no matter how much foliage there is my archers can literally shoot from the spawn in some instances, it just happens randomly, as you can see there's clear line of sight for them to shoot in this instance and they're doing nothing, same with enemy ranged units.

OP is a *SNIPPED* who doesn't understand that not everyone is a shill and that people don't like playing broken and unoptimized games on release, also he probably has been following the game for 3 months and thinks that the 8 year argument is not accurate criticism.

How about you singleplayer butterlord gimps just refrain from posting on MP threads, you're the reason multiplayer's **** in the first place. Completely neglected, servers barely have any load and still don't work properly, hitboxes are garbage, most weapons are completely unresponsive, no actual ladder just useless levels, players leaving queued games without punishment. I could go on and on but all I can say is 8 YEARS EARLY ACCESS XD

This game is mostly CPU heavy, if you're on very low and still tanking, that's most likely the issue.