hey guys, i've got a few curious question about history of SEA. i know there are probably are not much of a SEA historian here, but i'll give it a shot.
keep in mind i'm talking about more of an indonesian classic history here, that is about 7ad to 13ad. in the HIndu-Buddhist kingdom period. which influenced heavily by India. but some of my point might be applicable to SEA at the time
okay, so about hot climates, i understand we build our building as it was (full of open structures) with the woods and the open structures, but we at least had walls to defend an area, now, i remember that one candi (temple) that has a wall looking figure (its in the book "Candi Seri Jawa" forgot to bookmark the page) my question is, wall, is pretty important, so surely they made it with stones instead of woods? but why the lack of wall's remain discoveries?
and my second question is, i had this idea in my head, by reading some of the inscription, and just by reading everything in general, that land warfare in classical period is pretty chill, by that, i mean, no large scale battle such as Battle Of Cannae with 80,000+ men involved, that conclusion came from my thought that literally all they talk about is just religious tales, religious ceremonies, family trees, and achievement with some of the fabric thin war tales in between them, i remember reading one inscription about the kings achievement and the only war achievement that is there is just "for they had win against kingdom of wengker" or something close to that line. Point is, since the very start of our history, our people is used to guerrilla warfare, and no long campaign such as Alexander or Hannibal, this is because there isn't anything much worth fighting over inland, except for influence, so you can monopolize the shore, where the money's at. would that be the right conclusion? what's your take in inland warfare?
Third, so i found this
image of kris handle depicting raksasa in an armor from majapahit era, my question is, is this the kind of armor they used? and also, i already knew that the use of armor in indonesia is fairly common (for the upper class at least), but why rarely did the carving, or statues depict any armor at all? finally why is the discovery of armor remains are virtually non existent? beside waju rante thing of 18 ad
now why i didn't ask this in my local platform instead? well, i did, and you have to know that the amount of pseudo history our general public had is.. insane. so my question somehow got turned into religious debate. so im asking you guys, which i consider professional.
also, do you guys have any other recommendation where i can ask such question? sorry for my bad english!