Xardob always points out logical fallacies when one of his packmates is threatened. Don't worry, we'll get to you after Madaham.
1) ConsistencySir Magorien Maxihand VI Esq. said:Happy house moving!
Also, why do you think Hawk is scum?
Moose! said:Hawk, why don't you vote with Eternal, Brutus and I and join our wagon on your packmate Biggie?
Xardob said:I think he's saying he's scummy because he's not consistent.
MaHuD said:Delta has gone into hiding again. Its so blatantly obvious, that quite frankly I am a bit confused. Sure maybe you all dont see a link between Eternal & Delta, but Delta (each actually) alone should ring alarm bells?
Sir Magorien Maxihand VI Esq. said:MaHuD said:It does make sense, since people will vote you after Delta is dead. Right now pushing for specifically an Eternal lynch would probably lead to nowhere.
Just because I don't write down logic, doesn't mean it is non existent.
Right, I'm going to try to understand MaHuD logic.
On Day 1, you replied to (IIRC) Eternal's accusations of a potential Magorien/Bigie/Xardob pack stating that packmates would never be so blatant on Day 1. Yet since Day 1 you've insisted on a Delta/Eternal link that nobody else can see and said they're basically sacrificing themselves for each other. What makes the first situation unlikely to impossible (other than the fact that me v.1 actually did die and blow that theory out of the water) yet a buddy-buddy between Eternal and Delta not only possible but likely in your eyes?
MaHuD said:@ hawk I don't see the connection. How about you vote Delta and apply your night target theory to Adaham?
MaHuD said:@Hawk you were hinting a cop kill before right? Now its a wolf kill. That is odd.