Uhtred Dunkerch said:Same crime same punishment.
Two cyclists take doping in a race, one wins the race, the other doesn't. Should the winner be banned for life whilst the losing-cheater only banned for one cycling match?
Sir Galahad the Pure said:Indeed, that's what makes the big difference between the two cases ^^Aeronwen said:R1ch fraudently joined another team AFTER his team was knocked out with the intent of helping them to win the tournament.
Tallie joined another team knowing he would probably not play for team he should be in, as I understood it just because he wanted to play in teh tournament.
Harman said:Uhtred Dunkerch said:Same crime same punishment.
Two cyclists take doping in a race, one wins the race, the other doesn't. Should the winner be banned for life whilst the losing-cheater only banned for one cycling match?
Idd. The demege done might be lower but Tallie could make USA team drop out of the tournament in group stage. He 'confesed' after semies and harm he would have done would be irreversible. I also can't agree to such low punishment as 3 matches. [...]
To the point: Small things like this can mess up the outcome of tournaments. Luckily he wasn't good enough to carry Georgia but I don't think he deserves special treatment because of that.
Yeah that is an argumentation I can agree with.The demege done might be lower but Tallie could make USA team drop out of the tournament in group stage. He 'confesed' after semies and harm he would have done would be irreversible. I also can't agree to such low punishment as 3 matches. This kind of cheating can ruin months of training of a team that would be eliminated. Absense of 3 matches of one player sound like a poor joke comapre to that.
Scar said:Yeah that is an argumentation I can agree with.The demege done might be lower but Tallie could make USA team drop out of the tournament in group stage. He 'confesed' after semies and harm he would have done would be irreversible. I also can't agree to such low punishment as 3 matches. This kind of cheating can ruin months of training of a team that would be eliminated. Absense of 3 matches of one player sound like a poor joke comapre to that.
Ceasar said:But we both know that Tallie will not do this anymore, something im not quite sure of with Grifon or R1ch.
Bishopuser said:There is no "same crime, same punishment"
Aeronwen said:R1ch fraudently joined another team AFTER his team was knocked out with the intent of helping them to win the tournament.
Tallie joined another team knowing he would probably not play for team he should be in, as I understood it just because he wanted to play in the tournament.
And how do you exactly know that he just wanted to keep playing on NC even though his team was eliminated? I call bull****, R1ch hasn't given any explanation about that concern yet, as far as I know.Watly said:It is claimed that R1ch joined Russia to help them win the tournament? I call bull****, there is not a single player out there who'd cheat to help ANOTHER team win a tournament. I highly doubt that there is anyone who would find solace in seeing another team win the tournament. He joined team Russia, because he still wanted to play in the NC even though he couldn't play in his own team (because his team got eliminated).
Neathar said:@Ceasar: Yes the principle is comparable. For me and apparently for others too. Don't tell us what to do/think on the basis of your opinion. Just don't.
Ceasar said:but just don't even compare Tallie with R1ch. Just don't.
Watly said:This is one of the first cases of genuine (unconscious) discrimination I've heard so far on this forum. I would really prefer to keep the world clear of it, since unconscious discrimination is by far the worst in my eyes.
It is claimed that R1ch joined Russia to help them win the tournament? I call bull****, there is not a single player out there who'd cheat to help ANOTHER team win a tournament. I highly doubt that there is anyone who would find solace in seeing another team win the tournament. He joined team Russia, because he still wanted to play in the NC even though he couldn't play in his own team (because his team got eliminated).
Tallie on the other hand played for team Georgia, because he still wanted to play in the NC even though he couldn't play in his own team. By participating in a tournament, you are automatically aiming for a victory of some sorts. Participating in a tournament without any goal is extremely demoralizing and not very likely at this level of play. Thus Tallie was also in it to win at least something, be it gaining experience, enjoying the game with his friends or even possibly winning a match.
How come I am so knowledgeable about what R1ch intended? He actually hinted something like joining another team to still be able to play in the NC, but only a few actually figured out he was serious (me excluded, I was too stupid at the time ).
Thus their intentions were more or less the same in this case and also:
Aeronwen said:R1ch fraudently joined another team AFTER his team was knocked out with the intent of helping them to win the tournament.
Tallie joined another team knowing he would probably not play for team he should be in, as I understood it just because he wanted to play in the tournament.
Tallie was also fraudently playing for another team, why is this emphasized in R1ch's case?
Sorry for going too far off-topic, just felt this needed adressing.
Das Knecht said:So is it the Roman judiciary system or are we going by consequence ethics?
Because if it's the former, it should brook no question: same punishment. But if we're looking at consequences, Tallie ought not get as big a punishment.
Windle said:The people here remind me of the following people... there...
Conclusion: