Current news from our media. It's also
hit #2 on CNN's trending stories, but that's not saying a lot, as this has been a slow news day otherwise. We're paying some attention here, but not a lot yet.
Anyhow, I'm not sure about the analysis in the WSJ piece. Seems the same overly-hopeful nonsense that was being spouted before Egypt came apart at the seams. Questions remain:
1. Is the AKP as well-loved as it's implied? They won elections, to be sure, but I was under the impression that the more conservative portions of their agenda had been the biggest problems.
2. What are the main reasons people are protesting? This whole thing started over a relatively minor issue so I don't think that explains it. Clearly, there are some really deep-seated resentments now being expressed. What do the people protesting actually want?
3. Is Erdegan serious when he implies he can bring "a million" followers to the party (which reads ominously like a threat to start a civil war)?
4. Why isn't he spending more time urging calm and trying to figure out what's at the core of this? An American President who gave a speech like that would face impeachment; I presume that this kind of "tough guy" language goes over better in Turkey. But it still seemed like a very odd speech overall. At the very least, it seems bizarre that the actions of the Turkish government appear to be designed to make things worse, not better. But I'm saying that from what was translated and from my cultural / political POV, of course. It just seems like a very odd way to deal with what appears to be a very dangerous situation.