Sig-worthy quote in the Sig-worthy quote thread?
AWdeV said:'sides, lots of people can't be arsed to replace or change their siggy or they think something IS sig-worthy but doesn't quite override any previous signaturations.
There was definitely something wrong with it. Compare the beginning of the thread, in the quality of quotes and the frequency in which they were posted, to the end of the thread. The quality drops, and the frequency increases - occasional golden nuggets to great hunks of fools gold. People would post merely what they found humorous, but even if I wouldn't have had the same reaction, sig-worthy quotes transcend opinion in the main.AWdeV said:Then we are in agreeance. No need to get so pissy as you said that just after me saying that I couldn't be arsed to change mine.
I was, however, trying to point out that there wasn't anything wrong with the first incarnation of the thread as people were still doing what they were supposed to do in the damn thread!
Locke said:Swadius said:Locke said:I locked it beforehand, piss-eyes. And no it isn't functioning fine, because people are posting merely funnies, not things they actually want to sig.Folthrik said:Why start a new one when the other one isn't locked? The other one is functioning fine IMHO.
I demand from you and explanation as to what differentiates an amusing post from a sig-worthy one!
It's quite simple.
Sig worthy is something you'd put in your signature, but just can't be arsed. These are the elites, the top of the top, the grenadier guards of wit, stupidity, humour etc.
Merely slightly funny quotes belong in what made you laugh, Sig-worthy Quotes was terrible, I hadn't read it for pages because it was really mediocre jokes not worth the time.