armours?

[D1SC0 N1NJ4]

i personally vote for mail and light plate as it fits in better with the time frame.

 

[FrisianDude]

Well, yeah. Mail.

 

[hunterman52]

agreed neither factions did use heavy amour mainly chainmail and throwovers :p..

 

[Dimos]

Yeah I agree too. Only King William the Conqueror had palte those ages! 

 

[General Darius]

maybe make it so light and chainmail are decent but plate armor is always in good condition BUT its VERY VERY VERY VERY, did i mention very?, EXPENSIVE

 

[Dimos]

I think I maybe can do it, but since my new project is up, I put most efforet there for now... 

 

[Sidus Preclarum]

i personally vote for mail and light plate as it fits in better with the time frame.

That 's like saying "A kar 98 fits better than a HKG36 with a napoleonic timeframe" 
So, the answer is "neither"
What's this nonsense about "William had plate" ?!

 

[Dimos]

Here it is if you wanna see it!

Q: What is that?
A: A plate armour!
Q: Who's ?
A: King William the Conqueror's...

Post more and in the other topics of this board, to say your opinion for the mod... 

 

[Sidus Preclarum]

Here it is if you wanna see it!

Q: What is that?
A: A plate armour!
Q: Who's ?
A: King William the Conqueror's...

Was this some kind of joke? 

 

[Dimos]

Sorry if I disapointed you, but that was a kind of reality...

I saw that armour myself in the London tower... It is an authentic plate of the 11 century... 

 

[Sidus Preclarum]

Sorry if I disapointed you, but that was a kind of reality...

I saw that armour myself in the London tower... It is an authentic plate of the 11 century... 

Please tell me you're joking!
THat's *obviously* an early XVIIth half-armour
There was NO plate armour in the XIth century, you certainly know that, don't you ?

 

[Dimos]

Please dude. Instead of saying so just search it via google, or go to the London tower, you will see I'm not joking obviously

 

[Sidus Preclarum]

Please dude. Instead of saying so just search it via google, or go to the London tower, you will see I'm not joking obviously

Are you for real ?!
I saw this indeed labelled thus on the image hosting site you pulled the image from, however anybody can see the label is *obiously* absolutely fantasist and nonsensical!

 

[Dimos]

Not joking. That is true. I saw that before 2 years when I went to London and visited the tower of London... That armour is 100% real! 

 

[Sidus Preclarum]

Not joking. That is true. I saw that before 2 years when I went to London and visited the tower of London... That armour is 100% real! 

Of course it is real.
It's just not what you say it is!

 

[Ash_Crow]

Sidus Preclarum is obviously right...

Here is the kind of armor William wore at Hastings :

(Pic from the 2006 reenactment)


Putting plate armour in a 11th century timeframe is as wrong as putting a Sarmatian cataphract armour...

 

[Dimos]

That is William's armour, believe it or not. 

And Sidus Preclarum, you voted plate?  L O L , why? 

 

[Sidus Preclarum]

That is William's armour, believe it or not. 

*sigh*
This is surreal...
made a poll on this in the sage's guild, since I can't apparently convince you alone that the sky isn't stripped green and orange...

ANd I didn't vote anything, as I already explained, both answers are unsuitable...

 

[Dimos]

You two made that the fastest moving topic in the forums... I suggest that you lurk in my forums more often...

And post in the other topics as well ...

 

[Ash_Crow]

The armour you posted is from the time of the Stuarts. The owner might have been named William, but not the Conqueror

I am the one who voted plate, for fun, and because there is no good answer to the poll. If there had been a "FELIN suit" choice, I would have voted for it...