Orchid said:
Why people dislike inhabitants of a certain country, solely because they were born in said country, is beyond me. Such generalizations are not only blatant displays of close mindedness, they offer good proof of pure ignorance and flat-out stupidity as well.
Orchid, I am pleased to see, that somebody shares my point of view in this regard.
Jan Arie said:
Well, if you would like to hear a few of the reasons why I disfavour the French so much, I'd be happy to explain.
See, after the Napoleonic war, Holland and Belgium finally united as one country.
However, in 1830, Belgium revolted, and it came out that Walloons were the culprit of boiling the fire.
And Walloons are people in Belgium, who speak French.
Even within nationalism to dislike Walloons is not a logical reason for disliking the French as well, because Walloons do not have the French nationality but the Belgian. Speaking the same language does not make them the same nation. To dislike the Walloons, because of the history of most of their ancestors does not make sense likewise. The events you mentioned took place about six generations ago, which means that nobody of the Walloons living today can be made responsible for something, that happened roughly 180 years ago. As Orchid explained, your interpretation of these events has deficiencies anyway. In any case by disliking the Walloons as a whole you are committing the already mentioned fault of generalising a heterogenic group. Your statement does only justify the disdain of a specific political or ideological group within the Walloonian people.
Jan Arie said:
Also, I think French are mighty sore when it comes to hospitallity.
Bad experiences you perhaps made with the hospitality of some French are equally no valid argument to disfavour all French. Being French is not a sufficient condition to be an insufficient host. However the hospitality, which is offered to somebody, is always depending on his own behaviour, which easily can show a deficit, for instance if somebody displays chauvinistic traits.
Jan Arie said:
you do not appear to be a mere nationalist
Thank you, I've been an active nationalist for over nearly 6 years, and active member and recently moderator on my forum.
Honestly I do not quite understand this response. To assess somebody as a nationalist or not is initially a neutral judgement. Thus you do not have to thank me for a compliment, I have never made. I simply wanted to point out, that your self-designation as
nationalist appears to be not quite true, since your disdain of the French is classifying you at least partially as chauvinist.
However I am anxious to know, what you mean by being an
active nationalist, since nationalism itself is just a mindset and does not necessarily entail a specific behaviour. Or does being an active nationalist entail in simply being a moderator on your forum for you?
On a side not: You do not have to make a new paragraph after each sentence.