With my background in informational analysis and discrete math I thought I would decipher this tournament's player rankings.
By my first glance, I had already noticed a plethora of glaring errors in the data collection.
First, The moles having a cavalry rating of 81 is absolutely preposterous.
Since I have lead the undead hordes in underground battles against the mutant moles, I would rank their cavalry prowess at a 53 at the very least.
For example, whilst battling in the magma chamber deep beneath Yellowstone, my skeleton horsemen were easily able to outflank the outdated Mole cavalry who were in desperate need of reform.
Tito is the most ineffective Mole of them all, he is supposed to lead the Moles, but how much has he read into the philosophy of war?
Sun Tzu's The Art of War, Carl von Clausewitz's On War, Niccolo Machiavelli's The Prince, has he read any of these and pondered upon their complexities, I highly doubt it.
There is only one that I know to have a deep understanding of war in this community, and that would be the great Rhade.
As for my interpretation of this list it would go as follows...
Infantry
1. oodle
2. oodle's mom
3. my cat Tiger
4. myself
5. Snazzi
Cavalry
1. my cat Tiger
2. Grimsight
3. Rob
4. oodle
5. peers
Rangers
1. myself
2. vorn
3. my brother ryan
4. arys
5. sj
Godspeed
Dr. Skellings, PhD.