Warlord123123
Regular
6/10 is a fair score I reckon.
Hopefully, devs (especially their managers) take this into account.
Hopefully, devs (especially their managers) take this into account.
Their account is full of money. But it is good to see a honest review and a fair score.
Yea, but if TW is ignoring their community, then maybe they will listen to mainstream gaming reviews.
Personally, I have never taken anything said by IGN into consideration. Their "professionals" are some of the most 'out of touch' "gamers" I have ever had to listen to speak ever since early 2000s. I remember reading their reviews in Game Informer or other magazines all them years ago as a teenager and IGN always gave me vibes of their lack of being an authentic gamer or some Call of Duty kid who is a brat and their parents give them EVERYTHING.
Point is, they rate it 6/10 but Steam Reviews from actual genuine gamers say otherwise.
I disagree with the bullet points but I also know future DLC and Mods will include or already do include responses to all or most of the issues. For me, I look as Bannerlord as a perfect foundation for Sandbox gameplay aside from the AI. I also understand a 90+ dev team put a ton of man hours into making this game playable and plan on putting a ton more into it. TaleWorlds and Mount and Blade have made gaming strides in doing something no one else has done and their attempt to make an Dynamic RPG Sandbox RTS appeals to me because I've had similar gaming ideas for the past 25 years since I was 10 years old in the 90s and first played Red Alert. They're doing it and they're doing it well. Put the original mount and blade next to Bannerlord at release for both and compare while understanding what it takes to make these things possible. It's not easy by any means and I think it will only get better with polish over the next year or two in post release.Except it is WHAT is in the review that matters -that being the content. Now had this reviewer acted like your portraying ie "a herp this gAmE iZ Dump because I like battles with fIREbAlls and Spellz N stuFF..." ok. But this guy laid out very concise areas the game is lacking - a bullet point list very similar to another group of real Gamers -Taleworld forumites.
I disagree with the bullet points but I also know future DLC and Mods will include or already do include responses to all or most of the issues. For me, I look as Bannerlord as a perfect foundation for Sandbox gameplay aside from the AI. I also understand a 90+ dev team put a ton of man hours into making this game playable and plan on putting a ton more into it. TaleWorlds and Mount and Blade have made gaming strides in doing something no one else has done and their attempt to make an Dynamic RPG Sandbox RTS appeals to me because I've had similar gaming ideas for the past 25 years since I was 10 years old in the 90s and first played Red Alert. They're doing it and they're doing it well. Put the original mount and blade next to Bannerlord at release for both and compare while understanding what it takes to make these things possible. It's not easy by any means and I think it will only get better with polish over the next year or two in post release.
They had two years to play the game.IGN making a good and objective review wtf. Guess TW was too lazy to pay them haha
6/10 is a fair score I reckon.
Hopefully, devs (especially their managers) take this into account.
There is literally no argument against the popular casual vote, that's a ****ing cope and a half. People like the game, one review giving it a 6/10 isn't going to nullify that, and there isn't any reason to. Arguing about whether or not people actually like the game is meaningless, just focus on the issues that you yourself find.That is very satisfying and again a good argument against the Popular casual vote at Steam
I think the term your looking for is cop out not cope lmao. And sorry but there are plenty of arguments to be made about what subspecies of-what type of fan tends to have what opinion of the game. You can repeating it over and over but tryna declare that the Steam audience as the only and primary audience that matters - well now you’d be wrong that too skipperThere is literally no argument against the popular casual vote, that's a ****ing cope and a half. People like the game, one review giving it a 6/10 isn't going to nullify that, and there isn't any reason to. Arguing about whether or not people actually like the game is meaningless, just focus on the issues that you yourself find.
The review itself is pretty fair and hints at the issues that I have with it myself.