Users who are viewing this thread
Wow. Looking forward to seeing the new stuff. The changelog looks impressive.
Lumos said:
Have you seen the Wowhead Powered?
I'm thinking in creating something similar. So you can use the Command Database directly within you Web of Forum.
When you hover over any opt-code it shows a tool-tip with the usage and description. I think that could be even more helpful.
Theoris
Yes, that would be quite nice.
ithilienranger
Knight at Arms
Now, that I have some time to do some documentation I can't log in to the site.
Theoris
You don't have an account. 
ithilienranger
Knight at Arms
Well, why did you PM me in the first place?
Theoris
http://mbcommands.zxq.net/register
ithilienranger
Knight at Arms
Thanks, but I still cannot edit anything. Also, what is Description for exactly? Can I put in tips/tricks for its usage?
Theoris
Alright, wrote a tutorial, it's on the OP.
Note, it's quite buggy atm, probably because of the massive amount of new features. I will start fixing it.
Theoris said:
Note, it's quite buggy atm, probably because of the massive amount of new features. I will start fixing it.
Very nice! Although, I have two suggestions. Could you separate sp/mp from type? The server/client field could be a field that only applies if the MP/SP field is either both or MP. Likewise, could you change the Type field to take into account left-handedness, can-fail or control-structure? (ie. player_get_agent_id would be left-handed, player_is_active is a can-fail, and try_begin is control-structure)
One more suggestion would be a separate, similar database for commonly used scripts, especially game scripts that may have not-so-obvious or obfuscated inputs or outputs. Possibly, you could have even a third one for triggers?
Also, on an aesthetic note, the floating menu looks kinda off to me. Perhaps make it a floating side-bar, or at the bottom of the screen? Right now, it's in the place where my eye's first look if I'm "below the fold" of a web page.
One more suggestion would be a separate, similar database for commonly used scripts, especially game scripts that may have not-so-obvious or obfuscated inputs or outputs. Possibly, you could have even a third one for triggers?
Also, on an aesthetic note, the floating menu looks kinda off to me. Perhaps make it a floating side-bar, or at the bottom of the screen? Right now, it's in the place where my eye's first look if I'm "below the fold" of a web page.
MadocComadrin said:
The rest looks fine to me, but that last one hurts me. They're supposed to be transparent. Please use a W3C compliant browser.
I style my sites without hacks. So doesn't try to open this address with IE, Firefox, Camino, or some other crap.
Nowadays the only legit browsers that passes the Acid3 test are the Webkit engine's -> Chrome/Chromium/SR Iron & Safari (Mobile platforms included)
Also isn't supposed to be exactly functional. I
...
Isn't ready yet for massive use. Theoris, hang on the IRC.
Normally I use FF, but I'm at work, so I was using chrome. (I don't use hacks either--all my stuff is perfectly valid CSS2 and XHTML Strict or Transitional, but then again, I'm holding off on CSS3 for a few more months. And don't call firefox crap .)
Mainly, it's a placement issue.
.)Mainly, it's a placement issue.
I used to use it a year ago. It was great. But I found something faster and prettier to navigate. So Fx isn't that cool.MadocComadrin said:Normally I use FF, but I'm at work, so I was using chrome. (I don't use hacks either--all my stuff is perfectly valid CSS2 and XHTML Strict or Transitional, but then again, I'm holding off on CSS3 for a few more months. And don't call firefox crap
Nah, pure CSS3 FTW.
I thought it was useful. Let me some minutes and I'll finish the login system. I'll leave the admin panel for later.
This how it really looks. For those confused with the lack of compatibility.
It is, but it's just in a bad place if you're scrolled down far enough.
MadocComadrin said:
I have a nice idea about a subtle approach with that conflictive subject you may like.
I've just done the fun part. Cool Admin panel, envy of the Joomla devs. Access if you can.
http://mbcommands.zxq.net/admin
Note we're crazy protective against injection.
In other order, here are the currently active beta-testers. I'll send you an invitation soon™ (when this thing gains a little of stability).
Hmmm and yes, the rename option is twice.
Don't ask
Jerkuh
Knight
I could be wrong but isn't description to explain the usage of the operation?
So people can directly see what it does in a simple explanation.
What i mean is for instance:
Name Usage Description Type
is_between (is_between,value,lower_bound,upper_bound), Checks if the value is between the lower bound and upperbound, if the value compares to the upper bound it will return false. Both
I'm registerring atm so if this info is needed to be added i can do some little crontriburions of descriptions i know without testing them.
When everyone dous that i think we get a very nice database.
I also saw some strange css thingys when i vieuw the page with firefox, the menu stays behind the description when i scroll down.
So people can directly see what it does in a simple explanation.
What i mean is for instance:
Name Usage Description Type
is_between (is_between,value,lower_bound,upper_bound), Checks if the value is between the lower bound and upperbound, if the value compares to the upper bound it will return false. Both
I'm registerring atm so if this info is needed to be added i can do some little crontriburions of descriptions i know without testing them.
When everyone dous that i think we get a very nice database.
I also saw some strange css thingys when i vieuw the page with firefox, the menu stays behind the description when i scroll down.
ithilienranger
Knight at Arms
Could you make the usage and description closer to the same size? My descriptions are all scrunched up.
What are the points for and how do we get them?
