Equipment typos and selection errors

Users who are viewing this thread

Tingyun

Knight at Arms
1) One version of the Saxon light armor has a leg armor rating of +19. This appears to be a typo, with a 9 accidentally entered instead of a 0, it should be +10 (from comparison to armors it is otherwise identical with). The relevant armor is the 1st armor in the inventory when "saxon spearmen" are viewed in the camp troop tree.

2) One version of the Pictish light armor has a +8 head rating, but lacks a hood or anything else to justify this. It seems it might have accidentally been given this when the other, actually hooded, armors recieved their head rating. The relevant armor is the 2nd armor in the inventory when "pictish spearmen" are viewed in the camp troop tree.

3) This last one is a judgment call, but the Angle Bodyguard unit's sword selection may have been a mistake. The unit has better stats and powerstrike than the saxon bodyguard, indicating the angles are supposed to have a relative strength in swordsmen, but its inventory is filled with the worst swords in the game--nothing at all like the excellent weapons that saxon, norse, and briton bodyguards receive. I would normally call this a balance problem rather than a bug, but the contrast is so stark it looks like it might have simply been an error rather than a balance decision, so I'll include it here as well just in case.
 
Never realised the Angle bodyguards got such sucky swords, all other bodyguards get rich swords or ulfberths, while they just get normal swords.
 
Back
Top Bottom