i swear the faris has less arrows as well. My last run i used a small contingent of horse archers both khans guard and faris and the faris would run out of ammo very fast
i find that the stugian archers perform rather well. Sturgia are more focused on their melee infantry rather than cav or archers so it makes sense that their archers are not god tier. I will say they are still very effective at mowing enemies down and for siege defences (i just tp to a settlement if a siege is about to happen so i can actually test defensive sieges without losing a ton of troops breaking in)
I hate the small battles more as i have to use my troops and a lot of them will die
Dying isnt the problem its retraining troops back to that level grinding through looters in ar is a great way of losing a lot of decent troops so you are in a constant looter grind mess for a while trying to recover your loses (i go with a party of 150 troops 50 archers 50 footmen and 50 shock cav)
Plz taleworlds fix the fookin AR
The options are extremely boring and is extremely limiting on what you can have in terms of colour
Why can't we have 2 or more symbols and put them wherever on the banner we want
Why can't we rotate symbols
Why are there only a limited number of colour options
The list goes on
its nigh impossible to expand when cities not owned by the player are in a constant rebellion loop and wont stop rebelling
i am also struggling with this silly settlement management stuff and am constantly going round my settlements trying to get loyalty and security up which is practically...
If the captured territory is close to your lands, you should have a bit of a priority. If there are clans without a fief try to help them get castles far away from your lands.
The diplomacy mod give you the option to claim lands you have personally led an army to capture.
yep the lands were right next to sargot, charas usanc castle and talivel castle were all ones that i captured personally yet ended up failing to get for some reason
so i redownloaded bannerlord after many many months and have been pleasantly surprised
Now on to the main topic i am a tier 4 clan have nearly 50 relation with most of the vassals of the western empire, i was given sargoth and had to defend it for a long time from the vlandians, skip a year...
No dlc should be released during the early access period, to me it seems they are just starting early testing/development for future dlc ideas with idle team members so nothing bad in there.
If they keep improving the game and make it a good complete experience for the real release i'll be optimistic about their dlcs in the future and buy if it's something interesting to me.
If they "abandon" the game before the major problems are fixed and call it released or starting to sell dlcs during the EA phase they'll never get another coin from me.
The elephant thing really seems like early work of something, i'll give them the benefit of the doubt no problem until proven otherwise.
they really shouldnt be charging for it while the game is still in early access, if its free which it should be then fair enough but why not just add it in withought it being dlc, if they charge for it i hope it creates an absolute ****storm like when ark released its first expansion while being in EA
If it comes out after the games out of EA then imo thats fine.
It's a place holder or a left over from an scrapped mechanic, so either something goes in and it's needed or it eventually comes out of the menu. Who knows.
I'm not sure but is it the same option or separate that will make npcs run to another npcs in some scenes "I'm looking for...."? Could just be same stuff slapped onto all npcs even when they don't have use for it. It's kinda mocking when you indeed do want to ask a question.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.