Coruskane said:really?
I would have thought two-handed axes were at least in theme if not historically accurate.
Grimes said:Coruskane said:really?
I would have thought two-handed axes were at least in theme if not historically accurate.
Nope! People back then never thought of the incredibly complex idea of putting an axehead on a longer handle. Not a single person ever came up with it. Too busy farming.
People also never threw their axes, ever. Or wore anything that wasn't one of three colors and designs.
hrotha said:You know what else is a really simple idea? Plate armour. They even had it in Mycenaean Greece! How come no one in the 9th century came up with it?
For what?hrotha said:Alright then. How come they didn't have pikes?
hrotha said:Alright then. How come they didn't have pikes?
*FixedTovias said:For what?hrotha said:Alright then. How come they didn't have 2 handed axes?
zackgreco said:*FixedTovias said:For what?hrotha said:Alright then. How come they didn't have 2 handed axes?
What do you mean, "for what"? Are you implying they would have required a reason stemming from the specific military circumstances of the time to feel the need to develop a pre-existing weapon in such a seemingly obvious way?Tovias said:For what?hrotha said:Alright then. How come they didn't have pikes?
A pike is more than a long spear. And I disagree that it's irrelevant. I don't see why adding something that the devs feel would be out of place should be fine if it's restricted only to the player's character.Grimes said:We don't even know how long viking spear shafts were in the first place. Besides which it's irrelevant since people aren't even asking for these weapons to be given to your rank-and-file troops, just to have one available to use for themselves.
Breaking shields? Taking down doors? cutting trees?zackgreco said:*Fixed
hrotha said:A pike is more than a long spear. And I disagree that it's irrelevant. I don't see why adding something that the devs feel would be out of place should be fine if it's restricted only to the player's character.
Alas history has no space for assumptions, ain't that right? Only barely recovered facts!Grimes said:But no, we need the utmost of historical authenticity! Only things that we KNOW for SURE existed can be allowed in this game! For example, trolls and their clubs!
Grimes said:hrotha said:Alright then. How come they didn't have pikes?
We don't even know how long viking spear shafts were in the first place. Besides which it's irrelevant since people aren't even asking for these weapons to be given to your rank-and-file troops, just to have one available to use for themselves.
Pikes are two-handed weapons, spears you can wield on one hand.Grimes said:From what I understand a "long spear" is -exactly- what a pike is.
How would it be "out of place"? Most people here were expecting them. They're dismissing the possibility entirely out of a lack of evidence, which is ridiculous since evidence of it wouldn't even be likely to survive. I believe they used the same justification for gambesons anyways.
hrotha said:Pikes are two-handed weapons, spears you can wield on one hand.
The devs have already explained why it'd be out of place according to the opinion of their historical advisor. I have yet to see a proper source being put forward to challenge their view. Gambesons, meanwhile, are based on the idea that you can't wear mail without some sort of padding. Yes, gambesons in the mod are an inference, like two-handed axes would have been - that doesn't mean the devs have to go with all possible inferences or feel they're all equally likely.