ancalimon said:They are accepted as impeccable.
We only have your word for that.
That was a long time before that method existed, and he was making fun of contemporaries trying to argue that their mother tongue was spoken in the Garden of Eden.It's not understandable why you are making such a fuss about this. Why must he be wrong? Did he use regular sound correspondence method to determine that God spoke Swedish? What is the logic which led to you comparing Osman Nedim Tuna's work with that Swede? Can you show us his method?
About different letters becoming different letters when words are taken into another language... That is what actually happens.
When station, stop and scala are loaned into Turkish, they gain an initial "i" making them istasyon and istop and iskele. Sometimes words starting with L gained an initial i. ilimon (although limon is more widely used).
I thought we were talking about Turkic loan words in Sumerian here, not the other way around.