As someone wrote, the problem with archers is that their damage pierces through armour. Chainmail was already hard enough to penetrate at all and required specialized arrowheads or a longbow to do so at all. A person outfitted in proper plate armour would basically be impervious to arrows. What would have been the point historically to outfit yourself in ridiculously expensive steel if any Joe with strong arms could just gun you down with their hunting bow?
So right now, the game versus reality:
Vlandian sergeant gets shot in the head by an Aserai archer:
- Game: the arrow does 70 damage and the Vlandian sergeant is almost dead.
- Reality: the arrow bounces off the Vlandian Sergeant's helmet and he is practically unharmed.
This is why almost every knight carried a blunt weapon. The armour was almost indestructible, so they had to resort to beating the person up through his armour.
Accuracy and speed are not the problems, and bows can honestly be both more accurate and faster to reload. Note that in the historical period Bannerlord tries to emulate, crossbows were actually significantly less powerful than the bows used in that period. The argument thus applies to crossbows as well.
tl;dr arrows should not be Armour piercing, and damage reduction from Armour to arrows should be increased dramatically.
Reality:
Xbows could penetrate plate/mail, helmets and even shields.
Turkish crossbows were 3 times more powerful then western ones due to the use of goats bladders instead of twine.
Archers were very well trained, for years, they could shoot you in the eye at 100m and they did aim for legs all the time.
In game:
Archers have limited arrows, you can run out very quickly and stop being an archer fast. (very difficult to reload in battle)
Archers have to deal with OTHER archers
Archers are usually priorities over other enemies.
Archers get tunnel vision and often get taken by surprise.
Shields make archers weep, and so does missing and being blocked by "allies"
2-handed users are taking a risk, they are giving up defense to have more offence.
when you give up defense you often pay the price.
In every form of combat in the world, The optimal fighting method is to be able to defend and attack.
Hence whey shields and swords/spears where the most effective combo in the world and still is today.
Imagine saying, "no i don't need to use cover to protect myself " , "I'll just get a big ****ing gun and charge"
You pay the price for using a 2 handed weapon, pay the price and stop wining or get a sheild.