also note, if we make a Leather handle we cannot make it bend or move like a real leather handle will, thats why we will fix the shield with a wooden handle, like so http://www.freewebs.com/catherinesquest/shieldBack.JPG
My bad, as other users have pointed out, the executioneer would most likely miss the neck or the blade will not go straight through the neck, it has been report that it took many blows for a head to be chopped off.
Hmm... I see that you're going toward more fantasy setting with double axes in that period...
other than that - you've created some strange mix of balista and arcbalista - it uses bow-like arms that bent, yet still have construction for rigid arms (like classic roman balista). Either make it arcbalista (large crossbow) or balista (with rigid arms entangled into twisted ropes/sinew)
and round shield usually have single central grip, or if it is small cavalry shield two leather straps. Never two rigid handles.
We are fixing the handles, the balista, we got it from a mix of many different sources, the axe, there where two headed axes in that time, few yes, but they where there, that will most likely be the only one of it's kind, the rest would be what you would think it to be in that era.
They did, but the reasoning for that was that the executioners had a bit of a reputation for being drunkards among other things, and it was far from unheard of for them to take a few strikes to actually hit the neck.
Well no, we will show realistic Violence, what do you expect when a axe hits you in the chest, it will get stuck and you would be dead, the 'nudity' will be like the sims the it being pixelated
IIRC postal was banned for the pissing part and the ability to do crazy stuff like douse people in fuel and lighting them up. Plausibly realistic situations, that's why fantasy games with their fireballs have yet raised flags. Although I do support full nudity, I suppose you guys don't want to be ramped up to the 'M' rating.
georgeman said:
imagine if you are atop a wall and the most hated, snobbish, elitist Lord was sitting at the base of the wall, me thinks you know whats coming.
This game will most likely be a M or not suitible for minors so to speak (For two reasons, the actual setting and game genre will not interest COD fans and the realistic violence (I.E Decapitations)
Hey hey hey no need to go all hostile on mounted archers , it's easy to counter them with grenades,pikes,terrain and muskets.
I like MP and IMO it is balanced.
Btw you don't like it because you lose too much?
No, if you are on a very flat map with no cover and the enemy are the factions that use the horse archers, you are screwed, and the biggest gripe with all the M&B games is the aiming system, why not do it like the arrow will land where you aim it, or the musket will fire at where the barrel is aimed at, of course you can factor in the inaccuracy.
Well no, we will show realistic Violence, what do you expect when a axe hits you in the chest, it will get stuck and you would be dead, the 'nudity' will be like the sims the it being pixelated, imagine if you are atop a wall and the most hated, snobbish, elitist Lord was sitting at the base of the wall, me thinks you know whats coming.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.