What a great review, agree with almost all of it. Give me ****ing messengers.....
What a great review, agree with almost all of it. Give me ****ing messengers.....
We kept telling TW about everything in this video. From the atrocious lack of dialogue to shallow fief and kingdom management.We kept telling Taleworlds that we needed messengers and they didn't act on it... Now even bideo bame bournalists are saying the same thing, maybe they might take action.
I haven't played Vic 2 or 1 so consider that. To me Vic 3 felt quite unfinished. It is not just shallow but feels like missing a lot of things rather. I personally enjoyed economy part (although it is true it is a UI hell). There are some fundamental issues that needs to be addressed, like managing population growth is hard and not too logical. Your neighbour can put a immigration decree and steal 3-5% of your population every year. Only way to gain population fast is to keep increasing standard of living, which will bite you back when all of your buildings start losing money due to high wages. You can't move to higher tier products cause guess what? Technology takes 10 years to research and there are a 100 different production tech6/10 seems like a fair score, the game does have many glaring issues. What seems bull**** to me however is Victoria 3 somehow getting an 8/10 (Though it's IGN, I don't trust their scoring regardless). Can someone who played Vicky 3 tell me if it is a good game? Most people I've talked to told me that it's broken **** with horrendous AI and a clear downgrade to Vicky 2.
Thanks, pretty much what I've heard (also apparently there's no railroading or unique events from what I've heard) which is a shame, Vic 3 takes place in my favourite historical timeline and a game more focused on economics and politics seemed intriguing, but ah well, paradox gonna paradox I guess. I'm guessing that they'll "fix" the game in the next 5 years by releasing DLC packs worth 100s of $.I haven't played Vic 2 or 1 so consider that. To me Vic 3 felt quite unfinished. It is not just shallow but feels like missing a lot of things rather. I personally enjoyed economy part (although it is true it is a UI hell). There are some fundamental issues that needs to be addressed, like managing population growth is hard and not too logical. Your neighbour can put a immigration decree and steal 3-5% of your population every year. Only way to gain population fast is to keep increasing standard of living, which will bite you back when all of your buildings start losing money due to high wages. You can't move to higher tier products cause guess what? Technology takes 10 years to research and there are a 100 different production tech
9/10 on Steam6/10 in IGN is like 10/10 for game that doesn't buy reviews.
Who. Cares. You're acting like an elitist and that only your opinion matters. People who shut down criticism with the Steam reviews are dumb, people who act like the Steam reviews don't exist are dumb.I think the term your looking for is cop out not cope lmao. And sorry but there are plenty of arguments to be made about what subspecies of-what type of fan tends to have what opinion of the game. You can repeating it over and over but tryna declare that the Steam audience as the only and primary audience that matters - well now you’d be wrong that too skipper
You may not be aware of this, but 85% positive reviews is average for Steam reviews. "Mixed" means a game is outright bad. Bannerlord's Steam reviews are average.9/10 on Steam
Does this mean 6/10 = 97%You may not be aware of this, but 85% positive reviews is average for Steam reviews. "Mixed" means a game is outright bad. Bannerlord's Steam reviews are average.
That's probably fair.9/10 on Steam
What is meant is that Bannerlord scores average/barely above average both on IGN and Steam. And IMO that's with good reason because so much of the game still does not work 10 (ten!) years later.Does this mean 6/10 = 97%
Vicky 3 throws out the war side of the game and replaces it with an incredibly simplistic and unengaging system, their explanation was that they were going to make the economic side the focus of the game but they didn't do that either because it is very easy to break the game by simply doing trade tariffs, keeping taxes at their lowest, never having an army, never signing trade treaties, just getting all your money off tariffs. You make an enormous amount of money that way because the game just doesn't work.6/10 seems like a fair score, the game does have many glaring issues. What seems bull**** to me however is Victoria 3 somehow getting an 8/10 (Though it's IGN, I don't trust their scoring regardless). Can someone who played Vicky 3 tell me if it is a good game? Most people I've talked to told me that it's broken **** with horrendous AI and a clear downgrade to Vicky 2. I was considering "buying" it before I asked other people's opinions on the game, but give me your opinions on Vic 3 please.
Point is, they rate it 6/10 but Steam Reviews from actual genuine gamers say otherwise.