...
[Werewolf: Archive] Werewolf: A Forum Affair II - Forumite Victory
- Thread starter Elisianthus
- Start date
Users who are viewing this thread
lordJehovah
Grandmaster Knight
Still, I feel that the game is well on-track now. Now, to wait for the day to end...
Magorian Aximand said:
Suffice it to say that, in the words of many people over the ages, fortune favours the audacious.
As for acting like you were innocent in the past, if you are now not acting as if you are innocent and supposedly being the sacrificial lamb to draw out conversation, does this now supposedly discount you from being lynched?
Care to provide some sort of justification?
Pachinko said:
Wait for the day to end? You've got some votes on someone other than you, and you're just gonna wait it out, huh? No wolf hunting, no discussion, no explanation of your own vote, no exploration of new topics.
This is not innocent play Pachy.
Vermillion_Hawk said:
Uhh, what? I think you misunderstood. What I sad was that prior reputation can only serve to ward off suspicion if you behave the same way you did before in games when you were innocent. I would actually argue that it shouldn't, but that it does can't be disputed. I then went on to point out that I'm not playing the way I have in the past (in any games, innocent or otherwise), so prior reputation cannot be used to "protect" me.
Then, separately to that point, I explained why I'm behaving differently.
Bulle said:
Much as I would love to jump on that one, I'm inclined to think that Hawk is being more vindictive than wolfish. You're not terribly active around the AG anymore, but you should know that Hawk and I haven't exactly gotten along. I am, actually, honestly more suspicious of Pachinko. Ironic, considering my first post.
lordJehovah
Grandmaster Knight
Well, I was getting to that...Magorian Aximand said:
Well, to start, I'll talk about my voting you. I just think that, in trying to frame others, you're actually trying to deviate attention from yourself. So yeah, that's why I voted you.
lordJehovah
Grandmaster Knight
*/snip of Maggie's post
"Frame" others to draw attention away from myself, when there was as of yet no attention on me and in a fashion that would do nothing but bring attention to me.
Right.
Right.
lordJehovah
Grandmaster Knight
Well, that's how it came to me, anyways. No hard feelings.
It came to you that way, and when it's shown to be ridiculous you're just going to stick to it?
lordJehovah
Grandmaster Knight
It seemed that you were already preparing a ground for yourself, so that you distract everyone enough that they keep discussing, and remain safe yourself.
Seemed. Past tense.
lordJehovah
Grandmaster Knight
I was talking about the time when you expressed your idea that either Konig or I would be the first person to be lynched.
I got that...
That doesn't explain why you would be interested in maintaining your vote on me in light of the fact that your interpretation of my actions has been shown to be patently ridiculous, or why you would be interested in just waiting for the end of the day...
That doesn't explain why you would be interested in maintaining your vote on me in light of the fact that your interpretation of my actions has been shown to be patently ridiculous, or why you would be interested in just waiting for the end of the day...
Magorian Aximand said:Vermillion_Hawk said:
Uhh, what? I think you misunderstood. What I sad was that prior reputation can only serve to ward off suspicion if you behave the same way you did before in games when you were innocent. I would actually argue that it shouldn't, but that it does can't be disputed. I then went on to point out that I'm not playing the way I have in the past (in any games, innocent or otherwise), so prior reputation cannot be used to "protect" me.
Then, separately to that point, I explained why I'm behaving differently.
Bulle said:
Much as I would love to jump on that one, I'm inclined to think that Hawk is being more vindictive than wolfish. You're not terribly active around the AG anymore, but you should know that Hawk and I haven't exactly gotten along. I am, actually, honestly more suspicious of Pachinko. Ironic, considering my first post.
I suppose I did misrepresent what you were saying with the whole reputation bit.
I will not deny that initially, I was going to vote for you in the standard first-round vote as a bit of a joking nod towards that. I have no real reason for vengeance, I'd like to think at least that it's regressed to at least a somewhat friendly rivalry at this point. And anyways, I simply thought that what you were doing to start it off was strange and suspect. I have elucidated why, and yes, it's an imperfect plan, as I've said, but as I've also said, it's a very unpredictable game. Case in point, the events as they've been progressing.
As for Pachinko, I would also put forward that he's my second suspect due to his actions.
lordJehovah
Grandmaster Knight
Magorian Aximand said:
Well, that has a point, but I'll consider further about it.
And by the way, I intended the "waiting for the day to end" bit as a sort of neutral comment; like expressing my eagerness for the game to proceed.
There doesn't have to be a lynch for the game to proceed, hence why it's looked upon suspiciously.
lordJehovah
Grandmaster Knight
I am not eager to see someone get lynched; I wish the game to proceed just like it is doing right now. Sort of like, you know, expressing happiness at how everything is going as it should be going- discussions, talks, suspicions and similar stuff.Vermillion_Hawk said:
QuailLover
Marquis
However, not having a lynch means there is no information to work with, especially on day one. It pretty much means the village is at square one while the wolves get a free kill.
