Ukraine Today

Users who are viewing this thread

It was under Ukrainian control in the Minsk-II treaties which the separatists signed. God, it's like you almost can't trust these Russians. The times, the times.
 
Vicccard said:
It was under Ukrainian control in the Minsk-II treaties which the separatists signed. God, it's like you almost can't trust these Russians. The times, the times.

Well, Putin is an ex-KGB agent after all. When was the last time you could trust an agent?
 
Weaver said:
According to OSCE ceasefire is "generally observed" in the first 12 hours with few exceptions.
DNR "Ministry of Defense" official Eduard Basurin announced during a press-conference earlier today that Debaltsevo is DNR's territory so they are basically not bound by ceasefire if they decide to for example shell it again.
I say it's happening tonight.
What a bunch of hilarious ****wits they are...
Not so much for the poor ****s in the town obviously, but as someone on the outside that looks more and more like satire.
 
I am wondering whether the DPR will launch any further offensive pushes to try and cut off Ukrainian troops within the Debaltseve cauldron/sack.

The Guardian claims that Putin wanted to hold off a few days with the peace negotiations in order to have the DPR's Debaltseve offensive resolve itself possibly with the hope that leverage would be in favor of Russia during the negotiations.




 
Observing ceasefire
1363021475_deaf_dumb_blind.jpg


rejenorst said:
I am wondering whether the DPR will launch any further offensive pushes to try and cut off Ukrainian troops within the Debaltseve cauldron/sack.
They do not launch offensive pushes. At all. Their only viable tactics is to burn everything to the ground until there are no possible defensive positions for enemy. And only then they advance.
All their close combat assaults have failed with enormous body counts. Debaltseve will be shelled until it is uninhabitable and Ukrainan army retreats like in Donetsk airport.
Debaltseve sack had formed long before Ilovaysk happened and the shelling never stopped since.
 
There's a stalemate you mean but they have gone on the offensive in the past.
By offensive push I don't just mean all out assault across the front but possibly smaller offensive actions to encircle a small or larger area etc.
 
Wellenbrecher said:
Weaver said:
According to OSCE ceasefire is "generally observed" in the first 12 hours with few exceptions.
DNR "Ministry of Defense" official Eduard Basurin announced during a press-conference earlier today that Debaltsevo is DNR's territory so they are basically not bound by ceasefire if they decide to for example shell it again.
I say it's happening tonight.
What a bunch of hilarious ****wits they are...
Not so much for the poor ****s in the town obviously, but as someone on the outside that looks more and more like satire.
Inteligent and "puppet" generaly don't mix.
 
trueten said:
*spoiler=Donbas*
after Maidan, and Yanukovich's escape, Donetsk clan was under a threat to be totally anihilated and/or losing all that companies, plants and factories they've managed to capture, by new authorites. In order to prevent that they started blackmail Kiev with separatist actions in regions they've controlled.
*spoiler*
Ah, finally. A billioner, the leader of Luhansk clan, an initiator of Luhansk 'sepatratism' and former leader of Yanukovich's "Party of Regions" faction in the Parliament today:


Yet there's no guarantee they will not let him simply go.
 
rejenorst said:
There's a stalemate you mean but they have gone on the offensive in the past.
By offensive push I don't just mean all out assault across the front but possibly smaller offensive actions to encircle a small or larger area etc.
It's not a stalemate. It's more like misère played by UAF. They have orders not to advance but to hold their ground as long as possible. And the more positions they lose on battlefield the more Ukraine benefits in "diplomacy". As it gives a way to constantly milk IMF and various other sources while giving no **** about economy. You just have to tell stories every now and then about evil Russians and how you do protect Europe from The Horde. It's a win-win situation for all except those who get killed or disfigured in the process. The conflict is being prolonged artificially by all sides for that reason.

Just a small example: even before all that stuff with plane or Ilovaysk happened Ukrainian forces had actually entered Luhansk at least three times and were immediately given orders to retreat.
It's one huge theater of absurd happening.
 
Diplomats must attempt to turn any situation to their side's advantage whatever development it takes. They will use deaths and destruction as bargaining chips, doesn't mean they actually want more people to get killed.

I also don't buy that whole "We could have won the war in the first few days but then we were ordered to retreat because generals just wanted to drag it on" load of ancient conceited sovok bull****. Yeah, maybe there were bloody good reasons for a retreat?  Like the city being a trap jampacked by enemy paramilitary?
You could hear that same ignorant crap about Afghanistan, then about Chechnya and now it finally arrived to Donbas.
 
Weaver said:
Diplomats must attempt to turn any situation to their side's advantage whatever development it takes. They will use deaths and destruction as bargaining chips, doesn't mean they actually want more people to get killed.
Of course they do not. It's just a collateral damage.

Yeah, maybe there were bloody good reasons for a retreat?  Like the city being a trap jampacked by enemy paramilitary?
Yeah, sure. Bunch of clowns with AKs is whole lot more dangerous against combined arms of artillery, aviation and mech infrantry than fully fortified city with tanks, artillery and anti-air guns we have now. Or maybe you can tell me of any report of violent resistance performed by DNR/LNR forces even remotely resembling that of Donetsk airport or Debaltseve defense?
 
Invictus said:
Just a small example: even before all that stuff with plane or Ilovaysk happened Ukrainian forces had actually entered Luhansk at least three times and were immediately given orders to retreat.
It's one huge theater of absurd happening.
Nah, the Gov simply didn't want to provoke Russia to invade. So it's rather a political decision to retreat. Don't forget the mental issue of our post-soviet elites - provincialism and fear of responsibility.



Off-topic. Meanwhile in Crimea:
 
As soon as the separatists have taken the crossroads and the Ukrainian army goes on the offensive to take it back, I swear Putin will be on TV within four seconds crying about Nazi's breaking the ceasefire.
 
Tiberius Decimus Maximus said:
I think we disproved the "store armed separatist" myth quite some time ago.

Aren't they more of a mix of "store armed separatist", deserters from the Ukrainian army, Russian regulars and Russian Spec-Ops?
 
So according to German media some sep person said to INTERFAX that they're on a "steady offensive" in the pocket/bulge/cauldron and have "big parts of the city" under their control.
 
Back
Top Bottom