VC24 said:
God forbid you guys share your toys.
Except there's a way for people to share their "toys" if they so desire. They can put them up in the general commons where anybody can use the assets, or they can be ASKED, grant permission, and be duly credited (as they really should, because even if they don't put any work directly into a mod called "Parabellum" they have helped make it by making what goes into it). And again, it's not like the M&B Modder community is NOT used to sharing "toys", SO LONG as they are asked about it. Properly.
Again, they apparently weren't asked for their consent before doing that.
VC24 said:
"Community" actually means "place to wave your mods ****" on this forum,
Firstly, that's a hideous distortion and strawman, taking One aspect of the modding process (the ego drive) and acting as if that is all there is because someone objects to having their work ripped off.
But frankly? Even if the black picture you painted WAS true it still wouldn't justify this kind of massive plagiarism. Because yes- surprise!- one reason modders do what they do is for the recognition and fame. Do you really think the "user rank" icon to the left is just there for show?
VC24 said:
and for what? No one collaborates, no one shares,
Again, as someone who has been a bit of a handmaiden to two mods, that isn't true and I know it. Looking back, it is a bit of a shame BfY changed out the disclaimer (that it was originally inspired by a mod made by another plagiarist), because it would be really used to it. But again, in general the modders I've seen (admittedly as an outsider looking in) have generally been very happy to let people use their materials so long as they get duly credited. That wasn't the case here.
VC24 said:
Yeah you guys are heroes for *****ing about meaningless media you cant be paid for,
This would be A LOT More freaking convincing if it weren't for the fact that we've already seen two paid spinoffs made by independent teams from this engine already (With Fire and Sword, and Caribbean! Blood and Gold). That is, mods or glorified mods (however glorious they may be) where people have literally been charged Money- real world money- in order to get these products. Which have often started out buggy as heck and in one case (namely WF&S) were never freaking fixed like they were said.
But the thing is, the track record has already shown that M&B mods (the "meaningless media you cant (SIC) be paid for") can in fact get you paid. So this is a bit more serious than you want to admit.
And to the best of my knowledge neither WF&S or Carib used anybody else's assets without them asking
VC24 said:
instead of spreading your work around the community to advertise your talent.
Firstly: you're complaining about the original content creators complaining and not "spreading their work" (in spite of the fact that they wouldn't be the ones spreading their work in this scenario, someone thought they could go by on the sly using it). But let's turn that around:
Whose fault is that Really? Who let it degenerate to the situation we see, where the content creators like Hinkel84 are on here pointing out what was lifted from their work after the fact and drawing bad press to it?
DING DING DING. Tha's right. The primary modder. Who had the CHANCE to get these people on their side before this all blew up. Who had the chance to ask for approval before releasing it. But who didn't.
You ever hear of Command Responsibility? Leadership means on some level that "everything is your fault."
VC24 said:
Then maybe we'd actually get people to team up together to make something worth while instead of mods tagging us along for 5 years and then releasing a only a **** map pack because "Devotion to quality," "it will be done when it's done," "I'm only one man guys come on."
You act as if nobody has ever done that. As if things like The Red Wars (which Parabellum is clearly based off of) do not exist. Because apparently you have to shoehorn every single original content creator into the mold of selfish, sluggish, lazy, territorial, and unreasonable asset hog.in an attempt to justify what is really incompetence.
VC24 said:
But instead you use this as an opportunity to go "HEY! THATS MINE! I MADE THAT! HEY EVERYBODY! YEAH EVERYBODY! I JUST WANTED EVERYONE TO KNOW THAT I MADE THIS! YES IT WAS ME AND NOT HIM! IM ACTUALLY THE COOL ONE! ME! HOW COOL RIGHT!? I DIDN'T SAY YOU COULD USE THAT! I MADE THAT AND I'M THE MODELING/TEXTURING MASTER, NOT HIM!"
**** christ guys.
Again, you wanna spam all caps and blame the people who originally made the assets for complaining?
Look who let them complain in the first place. Look at the person whose lack of foresight to get approval (or alternatively design around) made the opening of this can of worms INEVITABLE.