Yeah, I was waiting for the rules to be a bit more set in stone, but so far doesn't sound too bad.Adaham said:I take it, that's a sign-up?
Yeah, I was waiting for the rules to be a bit more set in stone, but so far doesn't sound too bad.Adaham said:I take it, that's a sign-up?
Adaham said:Yeah, that's something I've been thinking about already 10 years ago, but the problem is then, that it becomes a host-driven, rather than player-driven game. Plus, people will always be able to accuse me of giving away too much or too little, so it's inevitably going to be a frustrating experience. If you have a solution for that, however, I'm all ears!Dark_Hamlet said:Jock said:, but there could be one more added element which would help people decide. Not sure what that element should be.
I'm up for it though.
The narration could give some ambiguous hints about each player.
Didn't want to go there, but yeah, can't deny I had similar thoughtsRoccoflipside said:I figured Moose! would be all over this game; lots of voting with little to no discussion to read? Sounds right up his alley.
Roccoflipside said:I'll play as two people. That way I can vote myself without it being such a big issue
Sorry to hear that, good luck with sorting that out!Moose! said:Actually no, **** just blew up at work, I'm out - sorry!
Roccoflipside said:Hope things get smoothed out soon.
Adaham said:Alright, so since this is SPEEDWOLF™ anyway, I could imagine a scenario in which we start off with one guy less, and the first innocent that dies replaces the inactive guy. For day 1 we could just keep the guy as the kicker if a vote is missing at the deadline, just try to avoid a stalemate with 3 votes each. If you agree with that, I can try to set up things maybe later today and start the whole thing soon. Might post a rundown of the final rules first as well.