Oh, please. If we're going to get to that, most(if not all) movies have generic titles. Examples of some
good,
mediocre or
bad movies:
The Life of Others(Das Leben des anderes)
Gravity
Yes, Interstellar is pretty generic for a title who surprisingly(sarcasm) has space involved
Star Wars or Star Trek, yes
Batman Begins. Seriously, that's a title? It'd be better if they said Batman 1 or sth.
The list is literally endless. And the Dark Knight Trilogy is lacking humanity, like it or not. And Joker never had any real purpose(in the comics), apart from raising(or ruling) Gotham, tormenting Batman just for the lolz, cause general mayem and such.
My point is that we cannot or should not judje a movie(or anything, come to that) from the title, but some movies lately justs feel like they rip us off. Pseudo-intellectuaity, the current star that shines(McConaughey, for example) and cheap plot that "symbolizes"...stuff.
And some people, like Nolan is overrated, that's a fact. I like Nolan, most of his movies(except Interstellar, that sucks) and I even like the Dark Knight rises. But he is overrated. He is a very good director, very good, but only one of many.
And then, we go to this:
Wulfburk said:
And Interstellar i'd say its one of the movies that really "touched" me, last time that happened was with 12 years a slave.
The thing you say, that the movie touched you, while true, is something personal. Just because you were moved by a movie, don't expect me to be moved as well.