Palaiologos said:
ares007 said:
Palaiologos said:
"Kingdom of Heaven" is a piece of crap
care to explain?
It would only appeal to the average modern day westerner who feels a sort of guilt for the crusades. The propagandistic "noble arabs vs unscrupulous crusaders" theme tires me. And so does the commoner blacksmith turned knight, then champion and uber-general of "the people" theme. Especially the persistence that Balian ,or whatever his name was, was doing everything for "the people".
It was too mainstream for my liking.
EDIT:Forgot to mention that Orlando Bloom is tottaly unfiting for any medieval role.
I generally agree about Orlando Bloom, but I thought he did a good job in Kingdom of Heaven.
You are certainly correct that it has unfortunately become mainstream to adopt an apologetic stance for the Crusades. However, I don't think the movie is necessarily doing that. The message in Kingdom of Heaven has more to do with the folly of dogmatic religion (it is not anti-God or anti-religion, just
dogmatic religion). Seriously, there were as many evil Muslims in the movie as there were evil Christians (possibly more). In fact, the best people in the movie were very highly placed Western nobles (in addition to Balion). But let's not talk much about religion as I think it is a touchy subject and can get threads locked
Concerning the black-smith-turned-knight theme. Yeah, that seemed a little repetitive, especially because Orlando Bloom played a blacksmith-turned-hero in another movie
. However, there is more to the story. He is not just a blacksmith, he is the son of a knight. The theatrical version does not really tell much about him in the beginning. The director's cut has a lot more.
Also, it has a great soundtrack
Of course, the movie is not without it's faults, but the points you mentioned did not stop me from enjoying the movie even though I seem to have the same or similar political stance in these matters as you do.