Magorian Aximand said:
You were the one claiming that the alligators were far more aggressive. The facts don't agree with you. And I was quoting fatal shark attacks, you know, not the little nips. The ones where people die. You might have been tipped off by my wording. "And sharks have killed, on average, more per decade." You can't just assert that alligators are more aggressive. You need to demonstrate it. You can't just assert that they're larger from eating humans, and that they eat many of them. You need to demonstrate it. And if you're going to make claims that are so consistently contradicted by facts, you're going to need to be okay with being laughed at.
You know what? I don't think any of us can prove our point. Mostly because when we talk about alligators we are being very specific. When we talk about sharks we're generalizing thousands of species. There isn't any article saying that Sharks are more agressive than Alligators just like there isn't one saying the contrary. But there are several articles saying that "Most sharks are less agressive than alligators" and other articles saying that "Some sharks are more agressive than alligators".
What you proved there was only that alligators aren't that agressive. I can also put here several Shakr species that are even harmless to humans.
@Burgass, what you said, was still wrong. It's like being talking about some german shepard and then move on and start using the word "dogs". Interpretation? You believe too much on it....too many shark movies, burg-ass.
"They are always feeding, hunting and moving"
So are most fishes. That means they are agressive or even killing machines?