FrisianDude
Archduke
No they don't, you ridiculous child, and no you don't. You're trying to spread the weird idea that the name of the movement is more important than the message. While simultaneously pretending "all feminists" are of one mind about all "us men" which is Gnarls Barkley levels of craaaazyyyhyyyy.Gestricius said:Again, that's all feminists want us men for.Headmaster said:Yeah, funny how she's also right.
I'm trying to spread gender equality, (Real gender equality) but Jhessail just complains and insults me, that ladies and gentlemen. Is not how you hold a proper argument.
And you should swallow your face.JeanChristophe said:Jhessail should get back on her meds, armchair general nr 1 lol
Raising both genders neutral would create a new synthesis, it would not make males the oppressed and females the oppressors if both genders were 'neutral' whatever the **** that means. The WHOLE POINT of the gender neutrality idea is to support equality, but you just go "no it would make it more inequal" without ever even attempting to explain why; you completely miss what it's about.
And when that is pointed out to you you just go on the diversion that 'feminism' is the wrong name. Which is completely irrelevant to any part of the message of feminism.