So im new to being back at this game -I see there is now a disorganized state after every battle but it seems like there is a fixed time 6hours applied to all. This doesnt seem right -we already have the problem of the campaign map speed being too samey especially when a party is chasing another party at the exact same speed just running to the corners of the Earth. Why would a highly organized army with a high level Commander be disorganized after an easy fight with some bandits? Hopefully Im wrong on this but it would feel far better if different armies experienced the Disorganized state at differing penalties depending on things like Tactics skill, matchup strength of numbers etc...
-
If you are reporting a bug, please head over to our Technical Support section for Bannerlord.
Disorganized State?
- Thread starter froggyluv
- Start date
Users who are viewing this thread
That would be more logical, but that is not the impression I have of the current implementation
Strangely, disorganized state is, I believe, the only feature that has a perk for it that's assigned to "Party Members", meaning any companion can have the "Swift Regroup" perk and reduce disorganized time by 15%, though it doesn't stack like you would expect from a perk assigned to "Party Members".
But yes, the disorganized state should vary depending on the battle.
But yes, the disorganized state should vary depending on the battle.
Seems like such a easy way to strategic maps and Battle Outcomes make more interesting and relevant. Like if when hovering over a Party you could see a very brief note on it situation -"Recovering due to Heavy Losses", "Leader Killed", "Exuberant Over Unlikely Win" etc kinda stuff all effecting the outcome of battles would now effect the world map with some variance -a much needed quality. I guess basic Morale does this to an extent already but its not that fun or interesting
It did always exist.
Antaeus
Squire
You're a hard task master. Your poor Legionary had to skip lunch and lost 3 fingers on his right hand and you wont even let him take the afternoon off.
Consider me...intrigued.. .... ... ... ..
Git gud
This problem is still there after all this time? I literally just saw a decent sized war party (130) that was trying to avoid a doomstack party of 700+ but decided to attack a Bandit party size of 1...yes 1! And the resulting penalty made it possible for the doomstack to catch it. this is utterly ridiculous -its not hard at all to add some qualifiers to length of penalty. In this case there should be literally ZERO penalty. I really have a hard time grasping why you guys like to use hard numbers all the time when just a few adjustments would balance the game
Im not against it -but it should come in more balanced manner. Meaning a party of 150+ troops quickly killing literally ONE guy should not keep them in the same state as fighting off a 200+ party -thats just ridiculous. i find map chasing one of the most tiresome aspects of this game as characters with matching speeds chase each other from coast to coast, speed it up and it looks just like pac-man. There are a multitude of factors that should come into play which would make the map chasing game much better. But they chose to implement something i would expect from an elementary grade coder. It was fine for M&B 1 as that was a revolutionary title for its time and you could excuse some aspects of the game being simplified. In todays day and age -its a glaring embarrassment as well as tedious to the player
I tried to make a mod which would give a random plus/minus to all parties, based on Tactics skill, every 6 hours but I gave up on it.
Because it was too hard coded into engine?
Ehh, more like I didn't want to spend the time to figure out why the first 2 things I tried weren't working. Maybe one day.
It isn't hardcoded at all, everything about party move speed is exposed.
Strange that no one has addressed this -if its easily coded im guessing its just needs alot of testing calibration
saittam
Sergeant
When chasing a smaler party there should be the option to send forth the cavalry to catch up.
