Woolwich Attack - Soldier Dead

[Lascivo]

You're right. You use none.

 

[Mage246]

Interesting how you seem incapable of explaining your ideas in a way that doesn't cause you to end up looking worse than before. Almost as if it's the ideas themselves that are bad...

 

[Bromden]

Really? You people really don't even understand what I'm saying.

You didn't tell us anything that needs understanding. For example, I'm still waiting for you to tell me why was that Mosley a decent chap and what was he working for.

 

[Austupaio]

The attacks against Lascivo before were standard fare, but for the last 2 or 3 pages they've been baseless or completely retarded.

He wasn't saying it was better for people to starve in concentration camps, he was saying that they weren't burned, therefore quoting whoever-the-****-Mosley-is as saying that they should've been burned is incorrect and likely hyperbole especially when compared to the source of the article which was actually ****.

 

[Mage246]

Why was it so important to you to distinguish between deaths from starvation and disease and deaths from gassing and shooting, hmm?

Disease is not purposely killing, and to some extent neither is starvation, since most of the deaths of starvation occurred late in the war when food was low and Germany's infrastructure was being bombed to pieces.

Wouldn't you be hostile if some internet idiot praises his role model that was actively hostile to your ethnicity?
How would you feel if some other idiot praises an Islamic fundamentalist preacher that wants to see dead Englishmen?
Do you understand now?

But he wasn't.

Lrn2read Austapaio. He thinks deaths in Bergen Belsen are somehow less intentional than elsewhere.

 

[Austupaio]

Perhaps, but like most of the circle jerks they have turned into a loop of posts that barely retains any meaning anymore.

I do find it amusing to see Ancalimon or Danik or whatever crazy **** is currently residing in the thread owned but it gets to a point where it lacks entertainment value.

Try insulting Il Duce and see if that gets a rise out of him.

 

[Mage246]

Itym Il Douche.

 

[FrisianDude]

Itym Il Douche.

thought that was a name at first.

 

[Bromden]

He wasn't saying it was better for people to starve in concentration camps, he was saying that they weren't burned, therefore quoting whoever-the-****-Mosley-is as saying that they should've been burned is incorrect and likely hyperbole especially when compared to the source of the article which was actually ****.

Yes, the article was ****, and I didn't give any credit to it, but a 10 minute googling showed me that this Mosley was just your average skinhead leader, and Lascivo didn't manage to put him in a different light.

 

[PoisonCourtesan]

Hard to see logic where there is none.

Yes, in this case it has been proven useless to argue with him. It has resorted to name calling and though I'd love to participate in this lovely party I'm gonna find something else to do.

 

[Duke Daniel Milutin]

Slimy wanker.

 

[Cyborg Eastern European]

Nice to see you've found an accurate description of yourself, dear.

 

[Duke Daniel Milutin]

lolno I found a description of people who uses the same jokes over and over.

 

[Duh]

If you arent a slimy wanker, you are doing something wrong. Just saying.

 

[Duke Daniel Milutin]

Exactly.

 

[Lascivo]

The attacks against Lascivo before were standard fare, but for the last 2 or 3 pages they've been baseless or completely retarded.

He wasn't saying it was better for people to starve in concentration camps, he was saying that they weren't burned, therefore quoting whoever-the-****-Mosley-is as saying that they should've been burned is incorrect and likely hyperbole especially when compared to the source of the article which was actually ****.

Yes, you are correct. Mage thinks that I am trying to support the holocaust. What I'm actually saying is that there were almost no supplies to give to the inmates, and there was constant bombing raids, so it would of been near impossible to give them food. Did I say I support the holocaust? No. Are you going to give food to soldiers, or food to inmates first? I never said the starvation was not intentional, but it was near impossible to prevent it that late in the war. What I'm saying to you is a fact.

He wasn't saying it was better for people to starve in concentration camps, he was saying that they weren't burned, therefore quoting whoever-the-****-Mosley-is as saying that they should've been burned is incorrect and likely hyperbole especially when compared to the source of the article which was actually ****.

Yes, the article was ****, and I didn't give any credit to it, but a 10 minute googling showed me that this Mosley was just your average skinhead leader, and Lascivo didn't manage to put him in a different light.

Hardly. He was the complete opposite. The ignorance you show of him kills me. The places you read from were probably anti-fascist or whatever. Read some stuff written by Mosley as well, or better yet, read his autobiography. But I'm sure you wont be bothered to read the hundreds of pages of it, and just continue to be ignorant of it all.

 

[rebelknight]

Only on that subject though, but in general, they shouldn't be grouped together. Just because some ideologies have some similarities and some differences doesn't mean they should be grouped the same. Putting people into a group because of one subject isn't exactly a good thing.

Besides, you miss the point which was to ridicule the same behavior and agenda you folk propose.

Fascism make more sense than your beloved Anarchism.

You are such a fool if you believe that.

Look who's talking...

 

[PoisonCourtesan]

Look who's talking...

I would expect no better from a man who values religion and nation.

 

[Kobrag]

Oh com'on Ath, just because you live in one of the worlds cess pools doesn't mean you can take it out on the rest of the world.
I think you have more important things to worry about, like avoiding Sisa crazed idiots and neo-nazis.

 

[Troll]

He wasn't saying it was better for people to starve in concentration camps, he was saying that they weren't burned, therefore quoting whoever-the-****-Mosley-is as saying that they should've been burned is incorrect and likely hyperbole especially when compared to the source of the article which was actually ****.

Yes, the article was ****, and I didn't give any credit to it, but a 10 minute googling showed me that this Mosley was just your average skinhead leader, and Lascivo didn't manage to put him in a different light.

Hardly. He was the complete opposite. The ignorance you show of him kills me. The places you read from were probably anti-fascist or whatever. Read some stuff written by Mosley as well, or better yet, read his autobiography. But I'm sure you wont be bothered to read the hundreds of pages of it, and just continue to be ignorant of it all.

Hey, I'll go ahead and admit I'm completely ignorant of Mosley, but would you mind trying to explain what made him different so that we can all stop being ignorant about him? Because, I'll admit, I can't be arsed figuring out myself, but you do kinda have a chance to explain your ideology. Not that I'm that impressed so far, but I can't exactly see you advocating holocaust either (Mage, stop being stupid), so I'll take my chances with it, you if bother trying.