Jimbob69420
Recruit
I have a pretty crappy PC.... It can run Warband 200v200 siege battle at around 40 fps, on average(maximum everything) but gets ALOT less frames when doing larger battles with the Viking DLC/ Expansion pack. I saw on the steam minimum system specs were pretty low but, my graphics card is integrated (I'm working on getting a 1080 ti) so, it won't run as well if I had an actual card.
Warband is amazing, but Bannerlord is better. I (based on my experience with triple A titles) recon I could get a a 50v50 medium settings at a constant 30, possibly 40fps
Those of you with more computer knowledge could help a lot
Thanks for your time if you put the effort in to read and answer this (:
Here's my PC (probably a rip off tbh but I don't have enough experience to build my own, or enough money to buy a better one)
AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 3350G
Radeon Vega 11 Integrated graphics
1 fan (was ripped off on that lol, said it had 3)
uhhhhh
450KW (W?) Power supply
Can't remember the rest
Edit, Apparently it's not triple A.... I need to get my facts right
Warband is amazing, but Bannerlord is better. I (based on my experience with triple A titles) recon I could get a a 50v50 medium settings at a constant 30, possibly 40fps
Those of you with more computer knowledge could help a lot
Thanks for your time if you put the effort in to read and answer this (:
Here's my PC (probably a rip off tbh but I don't have enough experience to build my own, or enough money to buy a better one)
AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 3350G
Radeon Vega 11 Integrated graphics
1 fan (was ripped off on that lol, said it had 3)
uhhhhh
450KW (W?) Power supply
Can't remember the rest
Edit, Apparently it's not triple A.... I need to get my facts right
Last edited: