Watly said:
1) 'more experience and more achievements' can vary wildly based on how you quantify it ie subjective 2) only an idiot bases his recruitment purely on 'more experience and achievements.'
You have a history of hot-headedly assuming a stance based on incomplete (often false or misunderstood) information. I still remember that time you spam harassed Xerxes in your NC official because Apollo told you he has 'proof' he is aimbotting.
Frankly, none of it is your business to begin with. You are making ridiculous allegations such as that we'd replace unskilled players like AngryNerd and Doner (xd) with far better players such as Eder and Apfel. If you feel so strongly for Asediado not having a team right now, take him into your 9 man roster. Until you do so, you are nothing more than a blistering hypocrite.
More experience and achievements sets subjectivity aside when the difference is big enough lol. And indeed, think I proved this with the way I ran my teams.
Big history for sure, the best one you just came up with is a 'call out' over something that many people were tricked with(false or unproved proof), and that you as main NC admin, ignored and hid from the rest of admins knowledge BEING A POSSIBILITY just because you share team with him/them. In my eyes that's far more concerning, it's always preferibly checking over possible cheaters and forcing them to record than just assumming that they're clean because you share team with them. So yeah, talk about assumptions and arguments after all that show including all the other shady NC **** involving seeding and other outcomes. It was my mistake on Xerxes' topic once again, to trust multiple unconfirmed sources memeing over something(alongside many people not only from full ESP team) that many people were stating that existed and we memed about(even recognised the mistake as it wasn't actually confirmed, told to Xerxes myself when he started to overreact on the situation on forums and in-game), that's the difference between retardness that you showed multiple times and my few unreasoned heated up point-outs.
Your latest admin ****show shows your rattyness and lack of transparence, I won't dig in wrong examples as they're recent, we could come earlier in time to see more idiotic shows but we had enough.
None of my business? Again, you brought this bs yourself with Carpe, don't talk **** and you won't get shat on. Not that I assume that you would do that, you simply did, and same way that in the past instead of investing in Malta's infs, additions were made.
I explained over 3 times why we won't extend our roster further than the current one, it's been closed for a while now and that doesn't change no matter if its a friend(only from leader and perhaps a few more members) or one of the best players in the game while being a former member. Your sadness over my view of your management issues is making you ignore this reasonable explanation that involes playtime maximization + multi-classing advantatges(On top of those, I'm loyal to my own decisions, if I invite ppl under x condition that I offer myself, I keep it), but again, you're the one who brought this bull**** first, just answering.
V1ncent said:
The team grew organically when Ase was gone, we needed and got new cavs to play the matches that were ahead of us, this is how the current cav line-up came to be, with Carpe coming back from inactiveness and haakon only somewhat active that makes 5 cav and that means we can't possibly accept anyone else, even if we wanted to. This is not a matter of skill, I simply won't kick people so somebody else can take their spot. I know I said Ase is always welcome back, but realistically there is nothing I can do. Toi, Eder and Apfel are replacing Angry (who is inactive), bomba and Döner. Thanks for your concerns, but as you can see, nothing concerning playtime has changed. The big roster is due to some people being barely active or inactive but we still leave them on the roster because that's where they belong, because they're still part of the clan.
All teams grow, that's understandable, but Asediado had that spot and he never got it back, and the point you state of 5 cavs would make sense if Mace wasn't invited knowing Asediado's come back possibility(I guess Carpe's return would've set him aside anyway as you would have 4, but that was unknown when Mace replaced him). So sorry but let's call things as they are, Watly was pretending that Malta didn't even know about Asediado's agreement.
Yes, you replaced inactives for good players, UNDERSTANDABLE. The only difference with me is that I didn't sign the inactive ones into my roster, and suddenly Carpe and Watly bring up some bull**** and get salty and mad when answered. What's the difference if in the end, we are both playing with a combination of our old members + new additions which are also known mates? Some ratty call outs provoked all of this and are overreacting just because I literally answered back, Asediado got his spot replaced by Mace ignoring that agreement deal, and Malta does play with newcomers combined with the old base, same than any team with sense would do if the old players are gone or inactive. So what's Watly's point crying about nonsense points or Carpe's 'point-out'?
