Buchholz Score
The underlying principle of our tournament is that every team tries to be at the top of the table. In order to do that, every team tries to get the highest scores in each sorting category, for this tournament they are firstly points, secondly Buchholz-Score, thirdly round difference. Summed up as principles:
I. Every team tries to win as many matches as possible to gain more points.
II. Every team hopes their previous opponents win as many matches as possible to gain more Buchholz-Score.
III. Every team tries to win as many rounds as possible to achieve a better round difference.
Normally every team can follow these three principles behind climbing the ladder without a conflict of interessts. However, when rematches happen, these principles are opposed to each other.
Example
Week 1: AE vs. FT, FT win.
Week 2: AE vs. IG, FT vs. BE
Week 3: AE vs. FT
From FT's perspective it is impossible for them to win both points and Buchholz-Score in week 3. They theoretically have to choose between winning the match and thus gaining points (Principle I) or hoping AE win against them and thus gaining Buchholz-Score (Principle II). Because, let's remember, the Buchholz-Score in its current form is the sum of points of all previous opponents. That's unfair on FT, of course, because no matter what happens, they don't have the same chances to score well in all sorting categories as a team who doesn't have to play in a rematch.
Therefore, the possibility for rematches has been completely removed. The changes have been put into effect for Week 3, we want to apologise for recognising this mistake so late, and thank all the teams concerned for their understanding.