Please start recording yourself in matches, I would love to see a montage of your couche lance kills!Firunien 说:Pls add top 10 most deaths, since you already show everybody how suicidal i play :S
ansonsten tolle Sache yona
[WNL4] Weekly Stats
- 主题发起人 yourNotAlone
- 开始时间
正在查看此主题的用户
- 状态
Haha, I'll look into it as promised. Und dankeFirunien 说:
Go ahead!Folms 说:
You can die max 16 X matches you played. Not that interesting.
Kragen
Grandmaster Knight
Megamen 说:https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1_Np8obPsWaNNu3i-D9pZE679Zmt8kekWYoFHTn3ibOA/edit#gid=0
Bug report:
Arcar has 5.4 k/d and isnt in top 10 k/d
I have 45 kills and i'm not on the top 10 kills
Edit: arcar has 43 kills as well
This because not everything is updated yet
Das Knecht 说:
Ye, well. I'm still updating Week 4 Stats and I'll update the Top 10 stuff after that. Also, as I stated before, I'm going to get some help after I'm finished with these.
yourNotAlone 说:
We might be able to make something that tracks this automaticly if enough people want it, we`d potentially be able to track more information, and much more detailed. But this would take alot of time and probably not be done until the next season of wnl,if there is one.
That'd be so awesome.Colonel Greed 说:
Btw, I just finished updating Week 3 & Week 4. Ye, I know it took ages. Yes, I'm going to get help for Week 5 and 6. I'll start updating tommorow or thursday again so enjoy the Week 4 Stats.
And, well. 6 People having 60 kills+ after 4 Weeks is sick. This WNL is so awesome.
gj yona
Haha Paulo's kill count.
One goal.
One goal.
Captain Lust 说:
#victory
Regarding the K-Ratio I'd like to suggest to set a limitation. Players who only played a single match for example shouldn't be listed in my opinion, I mean everyone can just turn up to one match, play one set and get a good score. Yet that doesn't give you an idea of who actually plays consistently well in matches, which is sort of the purpose of these rankings I suppose. How about only players with 20+ Kills (or respectively 20+ Deaths maybe, though that seems irrelevant in the end) get ranked?
-Ratio I'd like to suggest to set a limitation. Players who only played a single match for example shouldn't be listed in my opinion, I mean everyone can just turn up to one match, play one set and get a good score. Yet that doesn't give you an idea of who actually plays consistently well in matches, which is sort of the purpose of these rankings I suppose. How about only players with 20+ Kills (or respectively 20+ Deaths maybe, though that seems irrelevant in the end) get ranked?
Néathar
Master Knight
~Scar 说:Regarding the K
When we did it in the ECS I tried to cover up this problem with some additional information called "reliability score". I think it was your number of rounds played devided through the number of rounds playable in the tournament. So for example one player played in 5 matches, made 50 kills and died 5 times (=K
of 10,0). The other player only played one single set, but made 12 kills and died once. (=K of 12,0). If you now add the reliability of the first one: Every set in 5 weeks makes 80 rounds out of 128= 0,625 (1 being the maximum reliability, if a player scores 1 he played every set and you can probably take his stats as a true reflection of his performance). The other one, although having a better K has only 4/128, which is a rather poor reliability of only 0,03.The way players who only play one time but do brilliantly are honored is usually the K:R-stats. Making 12 kills in only 4 rounds will score you 3,0 (pretty effective), whereas 50 kills in 80 rounds like in our first example (which is still good but not as effective) only give you 0,6. I think that is a fair trade off.
In the end, like with every statistic ever made, it highly depends on what you read out of it, not only what it actually shows.
~Scar 说:Regarding the K
I strongly agree and some people did indeed already talk to me about that issue. However, I had the idea to exclude every player manually that only played a single set (map/match - I'm undecided yet) from any Top 10 list at the end of the season. If someone had another idea I'll gladly consider it.
~Scar 说:
No, I won't do that. Imagine a player that showed up to 5 matches and ends up with a 19/1 K/D-Ratio. It'll come down to the amount of rounds played (map/match - as I said above) for sure.
I'm just skipping it here.Neathar 说:
I really like the idea you came up with in the ECS. I'd probably use it if we had less teams participating. Besides that I won't go through all screens again and count the rounds and add them - that'd change my whole layout aswell. I might actually take this formula into consideration for future (and smaller) tournaments though.
Danke euch für's Input.
- 状态
