I think that there should be a WNL banner pack. For MB_tv it can help the viewers to see the clan banners. Just an idea tho.
[WNL3] Suggestions
- Thread starter Scar
- Start date
Users who are viewing this thread
- Status
Most of the clans use their own banner pack tho, so you would see all of them in a matchM.ArdA said:
That is a good point. We need global banner support for Bannerlord that's for a sure! 
OurGloriousLeader said:
Rend said:
Also wanted to suggest "Standart match day and time" for teams that fail to agree on it.
For example - Saturday (20.00 BST if both teams are EU), (19.00 BST if at least 1 team has BST+2 local time (or more) ), (18.00BST if both teams have BST+2 or more), (smth for americans), german servers.
In addition, referee is used so teams don't fight about dates. It's up to the referee to make a decision if teams fail to agree on a date/server.
In division C, is it possible that maintaining the lowest possible round difference (for the easiest fixture) would be a good move? I think so. That might need looking at. Perhaps simply randomising fixtures for teams on even points would be fairer.
14 weeks for a new team to get a chance for promotion? No thanks. 7 is great. Especially with the playoffs.Overgaul said:
Just going to bring this down to the bottom to make sure it gets seen. Think it's pretty important.Captain Lust said:
Also want to add that for teams who play after other teams it's almost possible to pick their opponent by planning for the round difference.
EDIT: As a theory it's like... say after the first week, the two teams with most round difference are being called the best two teams so they play each other. But that means according to the league's logic that out of the best two teams one will lose a match in the second week. So the league contradicts itself by keeping down one of it's self best two teams. Over time these issues should be resolved but I think there is a logical flaw in the way the system operates if it includes round difference like this.
EDIT2: If you don't want random, one possibility is to match the highest round difference against the lowest round difference for the same points (which basically makes it the old picking system with forced autopicks
best system!). 
Although picking will still work better... since it gives teams the chance to make conscious decisions (e.g. picking a team with high round difference who only got it because of a default win).
That works. Honestly RD is only really going to be important at the start and it's not a particularly accurate or valid tool, no matter how you use it. But at least this stops teams from benefitting by losing rounds in any way.Duken said:
To comply with the reasonable request to move discussion about the calculation of Division C's fixtures to this thread, I'll post here.
Since it's clear that this week isn't going to change, despite my protests, I would like to request some clarification on whether or not alphabetical order acting as a factor in the fixture calculations was an error, an oversight or an intended function. I would also like to know whether or not this is the same way fixtures will be handled for Week 3 and if not, how they will be handled for Week 3.
Since it's clear that this week isn't going to change, despite my protests, I would like to request some clarification on whether or not alphabetical order acting as a factor in the fixture calculations was an error, an oversight or an intended function. I would also like to know whether or not this is the same way fixtures will be handled for Week 3 and if not, how they will be handled for Week 3.
Is the 1st place in Division B going to move straight into Division A without Playoffs since Inq dropped out?
yourNotAlone said:
isn't there 2 from div B that move to A without playoffs anyways?
- Status
