Someone's pissy.Sarin said:After first episode:
They can't get costumes right. Everyone wears tinfoil plate armour that gets slashed through by swords, Nilfgaardians wear absolute trash ballsack plate, and the rest look like they just came off set of a cheap generic fantasy movie. There's not a touch of originality. It looks like same crapsack world like GoT and every other fantasy that came off Hollywood in last 20 years. The original is based on medieval eastern Europe, the visuals could and should have reflected that. They do not.
They can't get battle right. Just a bit of melee chaos. We don't see a decent commoner infantry that should have been there. No ranged weapons, short of Cahir who's apparently a good crossbowman-it is implied that he put a bolt through Eist's eye (hey, that visored helmet you had in the beginning had reason), and he shot Lazlo moving on horse at night lit only by torches. Don't remember him being such a good shot in books, but whatever.
They can't get fights right. In books, the Blaviken fight was well written, those guys were more than generic thugs, they worked together but were just a bit too slow for angry witcher. Here, they come at him one by one like goons in a cheap movie.
And they can't get the storytelling right. They butchered the Blaviken story. Rushed it, didn't give the exposition it required, and rushed the ending to the point that it felt forced. Goddammit, I'd expect a writer to be be able to pick out and preserve the motif of the story that she's adapting. Instead, it is disjointed crap.
Tell me if it improves, but right now I don't feel like watching the rest.
Jock said:Someone's pissy.Sarin said:After first episode:
They can't get costumes right. Everyone wears tinfoil plate armour that gets slashed through by swords, Nilfgaardians wear absolute trash ballsack plate, and the rest look like they just came off set of a cheap generic fantasy movie. There's not a touch of originality. It looks like same crapsack world like GoT and every other fantasy that came off Hollywood in last 20 years. The original is based on medieval eastern Europe, the visuals could and should have reflected that. They do not.
They can't get battle right. Just a bit of melee chaos. We don't see a decent commoner infantry that should have been there. No ranged weapons, short of Cahir who's apparently a good crossbowman-it is implied that he put a bolt through Eist's eye (hey, that visored helmet you had in the beginning had reason), and he shot Lazlo moving on horse at night lit only by torches. Don't remember him being such a good shot in books, but whatever.
They can't get fights right. In books, the Blaviken fight was well written, those guys were more than generic thugs, they worked together but were just a bit too slow for angry witcher. Here, they come at him one by one like goons in a cheap movie.
And they can't get the storytelling right. They butchered the Blaviken story. Rushed it, didn't give the exposition it required, and rushed the ending to the point that it felt forced. Goddammit, I'd expect a writer to be be able to pick out and preserve the motif of the story that she's adapting. Instead, it is disjointed crap.
Tell me if it improves, but right now I don't feel like watching the rest.
I was actually quite surprised at Cavill's Geralt. It didn't feel too forced or out of place, if not a tad young for him. It wasn't great but I hope there's room for improvement. Really wish they took time with the storyline though, not rush it all.
Wulfburk said:CGI was great as well except one single monster, of the ten or so.
Moose! said:Wulfburk said:CGI was great as well except one single monster, of the ten or so.
Is it, like, a different monster per episode? Because that would be my jam.
Wulfburk said:Finished all 8 episodes.