Which Fallout-game did you like most?

Which is your favorite?

  • Fallout 1

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Fallout 2

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Fallout Tactics

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Fallout: Brotherhood Of Steel

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • I've played PC games for a week now. What's Fallout.

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0
  • Poll closed .

Users who are viewing this thread

Worbah

Grandmaster Knight
Just what the topic says. I think that 1 was best, because it was more unified. Those of you who disagree, I've got two words: SAN FRANSISCO. Tactics was good also, but not quite as good as Jagged Alliance 2 or Silent Storm. BOS was a good mindless shooter, but as a Fallout-game... Well, it just didn't have the same magic as the original ones.

The only bad part about 1 is that it's too short (It was the only game that ran on my old PC, so I played it A LOT. I once beat it in one day.) and it doesn't run on Win 2000.

EDIT: The last option should have a ? instead of a .
 
I voted for 2. I agree that 1 is too short (both actually). The last time I played it through I started in the midday and by the evening I noticed that I had finished it in 1 day. Tho there is a video about a guy going FO2 through in less than 50 mins, so it is how you play it. I myself hope they could last for ever. The 1-2 have great atmospheres unlike Tactics (and the damn bastards ruined the Brotherhood power armor). And do I have to meantion that graphics in the FO1&2 rock.
 
I vote for F2.1 was also good,but 2 gave more freedom and you could play longer.I absolutely HATE tactics it F*#kedup the whole fallout feel.It's a real shame they stopped making fallout 3.I would've enjoyed it very much.
 
Verloc said:
I vote for F2.1 was also good,but 2 gave more freedom and you could play longer.I absolutely HATE tactics it F*#kedup the whole fallout feel.It's a real shame they stopped making fallout 3.I would've enjoyed it very much.

From what I hear Bethesda is making 3.
 
Worbah said:
Verloc said:
I vote for F2.1 was also good,but 2 gave more freedom and you could play longer.I absolutely HATE tactics it F*#kedup the whole fallout feel.It's a real shame they stopped making fallout 3.I would've enjoyed it very much.

From what I hear Bethesda is making 3.
They have bought the licence and to my knowledge are making it too.
From what I've heard it is going to be 3d and 1st person. If I remember correctly Black Isle was making it with project name of "Van Buren", but they sold the rights to Bethesda (they [there is no more BL so who they are I dunno] still have the rights to make mmorpg out of fallout universe).
 
jagged alliance 2! wow! i found this in a 6-game-pack my brother got for $10 at EB one day at a sale, and i loved it. such a good game. why can't they make games as good as jagged alliance, fallout and arcanum etc nowdays. it's all graphics, graphics, graphics.
 
Tactics because you had to use Tactics to win. They stuck to the name and the idea, Tactics was geared more towards combat than roleplaying and character development i beleive.



FYI FOT 1 and 2 suck. I cant get past the first 3 enemies cause my idiot always misses or i dont have enough action points, so i stick to Tactics and a nuclear radioactive chicago.
 
KirbyTheHunter said:
FYI FOT 1 and 2 suck. I cant get past the first 3 enemies cause my idiot always misses or i dont have enough action points
Thats just because you suck :grin: I've played FO1 trought ~6 times and FO2 +15 times without any problems, and many of them have been pasifist challenges etc
 
fallout 2 all the way baby. my dood had unarmed combat so high i kicked the hell out of the big bad mutant boss just like that :grin:
+ there was lots of monty python humor hidden in the game.
 
Jagged Alliance 2 was a great game. Best tactical game since X-com.

There are two really good mods for it as well. JA2 Dierdriana Lives! and the almost total conversion, Urban Chaos. Root around on the forum at the bears pit to find both.

http://www.ja-galaxy-forum.com/
 
I only played Fallout 2 and I liked it enough, my only complaint is that I was using a .45 revolver and I needed to hit those mutant pig rat things in the mine about a dozen times to kill one. I played Arcanum and I had fun with that because I gave up on being a gunslinger early enough to do something that could actually kill things instead of making a bang noise. I hope Bethesda does good with Fallout. For me Bethesda games crash and that makes me stop playing after the third or fourth time. I got so mad when I played Sea Dogs, I finally was about to win a sea battle after hours of losing and hardship when poof I was back to desktop, the worst part is when you forget to save every three minutes because you are having fun and then WAM oops start over.
 
KirbyTheHunter said:
FYI FOT 1 and 2 suck. I cant get past the first 3 enemies cause my idiot always misses or i dont have enough action points, so i stick to Tactics and a nuclear radioactive chicago.

What the hell? First of all, you do know that there is a 'end turn'-button? and second, Fallout 1 had rats as the first enemies, 2 had ants. You have to be among the ****tiest gamers I've ever heard of if you can't kill them. It seems that you are a member of this 'attention span of a burning squirrel'- generation (you won't believe how much I enjoy quoting myself. lets refer to it as ASOABS-syndrome in the future). I base it on the fact that you can't be bothered to try a game for longer than FIVE ****ING MINUTES!
 
The attention span of a burning squirrel is indeed quite short. I think someone needs to get paid millions of dollars to study this.
 
Back
Top Bottom