When's the Bannerlord section of the forums going be made?

[chubbyninja89]

This is something that's really been bugging me.

I want to talk about Bannerlord, but there's only that one main thread about it. Seriously guys, can't you guys get on that already?



And I guess I'll just talk a little bit about Bannerlord while I'm at it here, so calm down and just roll with it.

I've wanted to talk about how Bannerlord needs more maps and more varied maps in things like Custom Battles and Multiplayer battles. But above all things Bannerlord needs, it needs better AI. To be specific, path finding AI.

I can't tell you how many times I've just been messing around with a bunch of bots on a multiplayer game, only to have the stupid bots keep running into the walls or getting super easily stuck in places. And it's because the AI is so bad that they can get stuck so easily.

And Bannerlord could really use the regiment system in Napoleonic Wars.

That'd make forming armies in both single player and multiplayer, but mainly in single player campaigns. It'd be really nice to not just have Infantry, Ranged, and Cavalry but rather be able to actually organize the army you build up. I mean wouldn't it be really annoying if you had a group of elite infantry, basically the guys that you started the game with and trained up, with a bunch of new levy infantry and end up getting killed?

 

[Arvenski]

Option A: One massive thread full of hype and anger, suggestions and ideas (of varying merit), speculation, various tangent-going-on-offtopic discussions, and a bunch of trolling and idiocy. Much of which gets repeated time and time again.

Option B: An entire board full of hype and anger, suggestions and ideas (of varying merit), speculation, various tangent-going-on-offtopic discussions, and a bunch of trolling and idiocy. Much of which gets repeated time and time again. But hey, if they combine it with the Developers' Blog board, at least you'll get a new blog thread every few months ( ). Oh, and a board needs board moderators, so some poor bastard(s) will have to moderate that mess.

How 'bout we stick with Option A for now.

 

[Jace]

Also, probably when there's a Bannerlord to talk about.

 

[Pharaoh Llandy]

I've wanted to talk about how Bannerlord needs more maps and more varied maps in things like Custom Battles and Multiplayer battles. But above all things Bannerlord needs, it needs better AI. To be specific, path finding AI.

Feel free to do that in the Bannerlord thread, but don't be surprised if the Devs have already considered implementing things like more/varied maps and a better AI. That's generally the sort of thing they do.

 

[Orion]

Oh, and a board needs board moderators, so some poor bastard(s) will have to moderate that mess.

**** it, sign me up. I've outlasted just about everyone and everything else. What's one more ****-show?

 

[Austupaio]

Not with that language, mister, High Lord Erdogan wouldn't approve of it.

 

[Orion]

Erdogan is one such ****-show. I shall outlast him.

 

[DanAngleland]

That'd make forming armies in both single player and multiplayer, but mainly in single player campaigns. It'd be really nice to not just have Infantry, Ranged, and Cavalry but rather be able to actually organize the army you build up. I mean wouldn't it be really annoying if you had a group of elite infantry, basically the guys that you started the game with and trained up, with a bunch of new levy infantry and end up getting killed?

There are already about nine groups in Warband, but the only three that are named are infantry, archers and cavalry- the rest are unnamed in Warband for the player to customise. I sometimes make a second infantry group or companion group to keep companions with me on the battlefield.

 

[chubbyninja89]

I've wanted to talk about how Bannerlord needs more maps and more varied maps in things like Custom Battles and Multiplayer battles. But above all things Bannerlord needs, it needs better AI. To be specific, path finding AI.

Feel free to do that in the Bannerlord thread, but don't be surprised if the Devs have already considered implementing things like more/varied maps and a better AI. That's generally the sort of thing they do.

Well the fact that it's just one giant stupid thread and not it's own thing makes it all get lost. Meaning that if you post about one topic, it'll get lost in just how long the thread is.

I do believe that alone makes for game, set, and match.

 

[chubbyninja89]

That'd make forming armies in both single player and multiplayer, but mainly in single player campaigns. It'd be really nice to not just have Infantry, Ranged, and Cavalry but rather be able to actually organize the army you build up. I mean wouldn't it be really annoying if you had a group of elite infantry, basically the guys that you started the game with and trained up, with a bunch of new levy infantry and end up getting killed?

There are already about nine groups in Warband, but the only three that are named are infantry, archers and cavalry- the rest are unnamed in Warband for the player to customise. I sometimes make a second infantry group or companion group to keep companions with me on the battlefield.

Well it'd be nice if Tale Worlds would apply what was in Napoleonic Wars to Warband, with being able to set up custom battles. Then you'd be able to actually set up your army more properly than just putting all your infantry in front of your archers. It would give a lot more flexibility and replay ability to custom battles as well. And if they added more freaking maps, that'd be nice too.

 

[Alene]

Well it'd be nice if Tale Worlds would apply what was in Napoleonic Wars to Warband, with being able to set up custom battles. Then you'd be able to actually set up your army more properly than just putting all your infantry in front of your archers. It would give a lot more flexibility and replay ability to custom battles as well. And if they added more freaking maps, that'd be nice too.

This is not the place to talk about that. You were told that before by a moderator, but I'll tell you again.

You can talk about the game in the thread dedicated for it, or if you want to make a suggestion, then use The Privy Council board. This thread is about forum board for Bannerlord, not about the game itself.

 

[Arcadius112]

I don't believe reskins should have their own boards, personally.

 

[Cpt. Nemo]

Yeah. I keep telling the admins to just delete the entire Warband section, but they don't listen to me.

 

[Arcadius112]

Actually probably not the best idea, we don't want the Warband peasants to migrate to off-topic.