Rule zum Rabensang
Grandmaster Knight
what type of thing? madness?John7 said:I just find this type of thing interesting
what type of thing? madness?John7 said:I just find this type of thing interesting
John7 said:How will we know that RFID becomes the mark of the beast...
You can't even give a non-scientific one, so no news there.rgodfrey said:I cannot give a scientific explanation
a) Barcodes can also be read multiple times at once.with the exception that an RFID reader can read at greater distances and read multiple items at once.
If they couldn't it would have been somewhat crippling for the consumer radio industrySome can even read through boxes, cargo containers, clothing and purses.
On the internet. Are you sure about that?Sometimes the data is associated with a database available on the Internet
No they haven't. Or at least not in any published study.CASPIAN warns that implantable RFID tags will destroy privacy and pose health risks (Malignant tumors have been discovered in some animals at the site of the implant).
I should think it was more likely they didn't want to restrict their range purely to RFID.The opposition merely forced the company Verichip Corp. to be extremely careful with the wording of newly released information.
Unbelievable because we don't actually have nano technology?Nano technology is taking RFID implants to unbelievable levels of miniaturization.
Care to explain how they've overcome the problem of electrons not behaving themselves on the quantum scale? The Nobel Prize committee are waiting ...Scientists can now use nano-sized particles to build RFID
Probably not. Until they come up with a way to avoid you destroying the implant. It's why it's so bloody hard to track animal populations.John7 said:Do you really think people will get RFID under their skin
I don't get mine until mid afternoon either. A proper morning is just too busy for food.Nodscouter said:You really eat your breakfast late.
Awww. Don't worry, Madoc; you can imply me any day.MadocComadrin said:The woman was implied!
The mark of the Beast is a computer chip? I must have missed that part of the Bible.rgodfrey said:This story is purely a work of fiction. However, this scenario is based on technology available right now, which could eventually be used for implementing the Mark of the Beast.
It's nice to know that they apply that to more than just other religions.K-64 said:Quick! I don't know **** about this stuff, let's call it satanism!
Even better, it is poorly interpreted Biblical prophecy...aka taking the Book of Revelation as a literalist prophecy of how events are going to unfold, rather than the metaphoric context for which it was intended and has been understood by mainstream Christianity for centuries.Magorian Aximand said:I like how rgodfrey's justification for this nonsense is Biblical prophesy, a.k.a. more nonsense.
John7 said:I just find this type of thing interesting
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Number_of_the_Beast#616Trevty said:I want a citation for that. I've never heard it before.Burgass said:Finally someone else!
Trevty said:Ah, still, there's only a few that say that versus the majority that say 666.Shatari said:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Number_of_the_Beast#616
Hyperion said:Probably lost in translation or transcription, if you ask me.
Please tell me that you aren't basing your belief on an "appeal to majority" fallacy.Trevty said:Ah, still, there's only a few that say that versus the majority that say 666.
Trevty said:...If majority decided truth, we would live in a messed up world...