No problem.
-
If you are reporting a bug, please head over to our Technical Support section for Bannerlord.
What happened to the option for disabling women warriors?
- 主题发起人 InsaneGoat
- 开始时间
正在查看此主题的用户
- 状态
No problem.
I think people are mainly concerned with companions and faction characters... I think I have 3/4 female companions myself... One of em looks positive derpy... I need to find her a helmet to cover her face.
Go here follow the instructions TIL
Configuration
When you first load a save game, a configuration file will be created in \Mount & Blade II Bannerlord\bin\Win64_Shipping_Client called femaletroops.ini
DoHeroes=false # false = Will not change hero-type units. TargetUnits takes precedence over this setting if applicable.
DoSoldiers=true # false = Will not change soldier-type units. TargetUnits takes precedence over this setting if applicable.
DoInfantry=true # false = Will not change infantry-type units, such as looters. TargetUnits takes precedence over this setting if applicable.
DoArchers=true # false = Will not change archer-type units. TargetUnits takes precedence over this setting if applicable.
DoCavalry=true # false = Will not change cavalry-type units. TargetUnits takes precedence over this setting if applicable.
HideHelmet=true # true = Will hide the helmet of units affected by the changes. false = wont.
TargetCultures= # List of culture IDs you want the changes to apply to. Leave blank for all, otherwise list them seperated by a semi-column, i.e battanian;khuzait
TargetUnits= # List of unit IDs you want the changes to apply to. Leave blank for all, otherwise list them seperated by a semi-column, i.e imperial_recruit;imperial_archer
ToMale=false # false = Will change the units to female. true = Will change the units to male.
Debate over, now we can appease everyone.
Good find.
I have to agree with both.
This thread and the reactions are really just a sad joke.
Are you people yelling "sexism" here think you are doing your cause any service or act like grown up people?
For you surely don't.
What a travesty.
You're doing no better by baiting, intentional or not. OP knew what they were getting into when they posted, said so themselves. This whole topic is full of stupid. SJW's for championing a cause that wasn't being attacked. Anti-SJW's claiming something along the lines of free speech/expression. People feeling the need to thumb their noses at both groups to feel like adults instead of letting the children fight.
Being mad or disappointed about historical accuracy in a fantasy version, as depicted by a group of people we paid to play in their playground, of medieval Europe is definitely a personal issue that you can easily solve via the mod I linked. Everyone can get what they want, no developer time wasted for people's preferences (my whole reason for *****ing essentially). Even the OP was happy.
Any one left getting their feathers ruffled about anything at this point is asking for a pointless arguments.
There's nothing wrong with the OP wanting that option, doesn't make him misogynistic. I personally don't mind fantasy gender equality in games but it's just a preference.
On the other hand, out of all the things to worry about, this is pretty insignificant.
On the other hand, out of all the things to worry about, this is pretty insignificant.
Personally, I'd prefer female Lords to be rare but not completely removed. The same goes for companions.
natesiteweb_4
Recruit
>buh buh Calradia is fictional so who cares about some woman warriors?
People who say this should not be involved in making any important decisions about anything ever.
Yes it's fictional but its so off putting to see so many woman warlords. Everyone would be complaining if there were cell phones or some **** because its not ****ing realistic.
People who say this should not be involved in making any important decisions about anything ever.
Yes it's fictional but its so off putting to see so many woman warlords. Everyone would be complaining if there were cell phones or some **** because its not ****ing realistic.
I don't understand how someone can consider it misogynist to suggest that history be reflected in a game which is largely based off of a historical period. But apparently it's not misogynist to whitewash the era and pretend that women were granted equal rights back then?
Now when you make even the slightest departure from reality into fantasy, this does not give you a license to freely change whatever you want with the quality remaining the same. You must carefully pick and choose where you depart so as to only do so where it adds value to your world. For example, in Lord of the Rings, there aren't flying watermelons and laser guns: such things are not in fitting with the specific departures from history that the world chose to take, and they would not have added anything to the world, other than to make it seem silly and without any structure.
There doesn't seem to be any justification for the level of gender equality in what is essentially dark age Europe and the Near East. It wasn't there historically, and I can't see any reason for adding it, as it doesn't make the game more fun. We end up starting in a world which seems like it has been crafted without care.
The main reasons the initial prevalence of gender equality is not fun:
1. It takes away from the unique experience of playing a female warrior in the dark ages (lack of reason to play both male and female)
2. It takes away the player's ability to become a king or queen so as to shape the world in a way they would prefer (lack of reason to become monarch)
3. It detracts from the general immersion of a dark age medieval setting (lack of reason to play the game, rather than something more immersive)
It would be fun to play as a female character, become a queen (through great difficulty), and then equalise the succession of titles (or make it female-preference). That's a game the current setup does not allow.
I don't know any reason that the current setup is fun, and the people defending it seem to be just throwing out this frankly ridiculous argument that anyone who disagrees with the setup is misogynist.
Now when you make even the slightest departure from reality into fantasy, this does not give you a license to freely change whatever you want with the quality remaining the same. You must carefully pick and choose where you depart so as to only do so where it adds value to your world. For example, in Lord of the Rings, there aren't flying watermelons and laser guns: such things are not in fitting with the specific departures from history that the world chose to take, and they would not have added anything to the world, other than to make it seem silly and without any structure.
There doesn't seem to be any justification for the level of gender equality in what is essentially dark age Europe and the Near East. It wasn't there historically, and I can't see any reason for adding it, as it doesn't make the game more fun. We end up starting in a world which seems like it has been crafted without care.
The main reasons the initial prevalence of gender equality is not fun:
1. It takes away from the unique experience of playing a female warrior in the dark ages (lack of reason to play both male and female)
2. It takes away the player's ability to become a king or queen so as to shape the world in a way they would prefer (lack of reason to become monarch)
3. It detracts from the general immersion of a dark age medieval setting (lack of reason to play the game, rather than something more immersive)
It would be fun to play as a female character, become a queen (through great difficulty), and then equalise the succession of titles (or make it female-preference). That's a game the current setup does not allow.
I don't know any reason that the current setup is fun, and the people defending it seem to be just throwing out this frankly ridiculous argument that anyone who disagrees with the setup is misogynist.
natesiteweb_4
Recruit
My dude the difference in upper body women is not "slight", lol, it's huge. The average 20 year old woman is still significantly weaker than the average 80 year old man.
I don't care very much a out women having a larger role in the game but this mad stuff folk push these days about men and women even being CLOSE in terms of physical strength is really confusing.
由板主最后编辑:
This discussion has been had many times before, and surely will be started again many times in the future. The fact of the matter is, the game is in a fictional setting and creative liberty gives TaleWorlds the freedom to make the characters they want. If you don't like what they do, that's fine, but since this is exclusively an SP problem then I can safely suggest that you mod the game to your liking and be content. If you don't want to do that, too bad. Deal with it.
- 状态
