Phonemelter 说:
Explained (twice) by Xardob previously as blackmail.
That was much later.
Actually, no.
Xardob 说:
Pizza has to vote Eli, and the reason is simple. If he doesn't he'll get both my vote and Soot's. Yes, I'm blackmailing him to get his vote.
Xardob 说:
Fine. I need to deliver my threat anyway. It won't do if people start thinking they are empty.
Unvote, Vote Pizza
Soot, Vieira, lynch him.
Here you see you have the time frame mixed up.
First Xardob threatened to vote for Pizza unless Pizza voted for Eli.
To which Pizza responded,
lolno
~24 hours later, Xardob carried through with his threat and voted for Pizza. At this stage he made it about self-preservation; Pizza could either switch his vote to whom Xardob wanted to lynch, or risk being the lynch himself.
When Xardob saw me move my vote from Soot to Eli he abandoned his attempt at blackmailing Pizza and immediately switched back to his #1 suspect. At this stage, had Xardob wanted to lynch Pizza, all he had to do was to keep his vote on Pizza and attempt to coax the potential Pizza-voters on the Soot-wagon (Vieira, Frisian) into voting for Pizza.
Instead he supported a push on Eli. But it didn't have to go that way. It could have gone onto Pizza, because with my vote on Soot gone, a Soot lynch was one step back from being achievable, and those voting for Soot would have swung to Pizza just as easily as Eli.
And when Xardob had his vote on Eli and saw others moving that way, he didn't then start randomly switching his vote or continuing with further joking. He committed to a lynch.
This is personally what I call consistent playing. Had Xardob made a push for Pizza and successfully lynched him after stating for many days that Eli was his #1, then we'd very likely be having a different conversation right now.
Rest of your post will have to wait till Future, I'm tired and going to crash for an early night.