[Werewolf] SMAC: Unity [Game ends!]

正在查看此主题的用户

I know. I've been thinking that the last 5 minutes. My gut is screaming innocent, but my brain is telling me that my gut isn't rational or logical in it's assessment.  :lol:

My gut wants him to live to Day 2 just to see how he fares (meta reasons: also because I'd like to see more of him in case he never feels like playing a 2nd game with us  :ohdear:) but as I mentioned, there is probably a lot of information we could get from his lynch.

The reason I've not dumped my vote on him yet is gut, but I will put my vote down if it's needed for a Pizza lynch. If my gut read gets weaker as I read the recent pages, then I'll also plonk my vote down.

I'm also not putting my vote down because I feel lost in the game, at the minute.  :sad:
 
Vieira 说:
Perhaps they can take a stance, a la Xardob though with maybe a little more explanation (:razz:). It also might help in posterity, especially for myself.  :oops:

Fair. I just know that you have difficulty keeping up sometimes when there's a lot of in-depth post to go through, like when you briefly subbed in for Pilgrim in Mengelberg. If it helps you get caught up I'd rather you just made notes for yourself but didn't worry about putting them into a presentable format/posting them. But if you want to get your early notes out there, then there's not much else I can say.

Apart from...

Xardob 说:
Unvote, Vote Vieira

Just why did you vote for Vieira there?

And if it comes down to Soot or Pizza, where do you prefer to sell your vote?

FrisianDude 说:
Also you people make NOTES about this game?  :shock: No wonder I can never keep up.

I used to, but I stopped after Black Death. I realised my notes were 1) making me over-analysing every tiny thing everybody says resulting in too many WoTs, and 2) making me tunnel on innocents just as often as wolves. Lack of note-taking hasn't exactly increased my wolf catch rate, but at least I'm performing the same and subjecting everyone else to less WoTs. It's slightly increased my enjoyment of the game, too.
 
Vieira 说:
What exactly does Xardob playing more amicably mean, and is that the reason he is leaning innocent on Xar?

The one line I wrote on Xardob is not that ambiguous - it means exactly what is says.
 
FrisianDude 说:
I figure it's time to do so now because I'm not interested in the half-baked Llandy-attempt

Do you know what the arguments against Llandy are? What are your thoughts on them?

While I usually consider this a poor reason for anything I also see little reason to vote either of those two yet.

What do you actually think of Soot?
 
Phonemelter 说:
Vieira 说:
What exactly does Xardob playing more amicably mean, and is that the reason he is leaning innocent on Xar?

The one line I wrote on Xardob is not that ambiguous - it means exactly what is says.

So... the line about him playing more amicably has no bearing on your read of him? It's just an observation and doesn't have any meta implications? Cool.
 
Phonemelter 说:
Do you know what the arguments against Llandy are?

Do you?

All I've seen so far from you is "Llandy is voting for Soot, which she doesn't normally do" (meta) and "Here's some interesting Pizza/Llandy interaction"

Followed by an unexplained vote, similar to the one you put on Magorian. I thought your unexplained voting for first him and then me was you being bored and trying to generate some reactions, but if you actually do have some "arguments" against me then by all means post them so that other players can judge.
 
Pharaoh X Llandy 说:
Just why did you vote for Vieira there?
Good question. I think I was bored, and I thought Melter would follow me.

And if it comes down to Soot or Pizza, where do you prefer to sell your vote?
To be honest, I'd rather not lynch either. I want to lynch Eli today, with Hawk as a distant second. But if it does come down to them, I'll make a choice moments before I'm required to vote. I want to interfere as little as I can here.

Unvote, Vote Frisian
 
Because he joined me in voting you. I thought he was keeping his promise of lending me his vote and we were going to raise a little chaos together.
 
Pharaoh X Llandy 说:
All I've seen so far from you is "Llandy is voting for Soot, which she doesn't normally do" (meta) and "Here's some interesting Pizza/Llandy interaction"

That's not it. I'll explain when I get the chance later.


Xardob 说:
Because he joined me in voting you. I thought he was keeping his promise of lending me his vote and we were going to raise a little chaos together.

You ruined the chaos.  :sad:
 
Xardob 说:
Because he joined me in voting you. I thought he was keeping his promise of lending me his vote and we were going to raise a little chaos together.

Kids today, they just let you down all the time  :roll:

[me=Pharaoh X Llandy]aways[/me]
 
Phonemelter 说:
Does every single line of this game have to necessarily mean something?

Not necessarily. Just when there are all of two sentences on one player, it's kind of a bummer when one of them doesn't mean anything.  :razz:

 
I could give you a more extensive entry on Xardob, but at the time there was not much to go off of, which I said in the top of that post.  :razz:
 
Phonemelter 说:
FrisianDude 说:
I figure it's time to do so now because I'm not interested in the half-baked Llandy-attempt

Do you know what the arguments against Llandy are? What are your thoughts on them?
I don't. When I typed that I only recalled Xardob 'giving' Llandy his vote. I realized that wasn't a case but thought that there wereo ther votes as well.

Maybe I should keep notes.
 
Phonemelter 说:
I could give you a more extensive entry on Xardob, but at the time there was not much to go off of, which I said in the top of that post.  :razz:

I know, I know. Llandy already said everyone has moved on yadda yadda.

I'm just stuck in the past, alright? The good ol' days, an' all that.  :cry:
 
We're approaching the deadline, and tomorrow will probably be the last day for most of us to place votes, so let's take a look at how things stand and try to organize this so that we lynch someone.

We have at our disposal 9 votes that can be changed. I doubt we can count on Adaham, Hawk and Eli to change their votes. This is something we should keep in mind.

The top candidates:

Pizza - Hawk, Magorian, Melter. Vieira also indicated he might vote here. If it comes down to it, I'm sure Soot will vote him as well to avoid being lynched. So we're one vote short here.

Soot - Adaham, Llandy, Frisian. Pizza will vote here if it comes down to it. Two more needed to reach a lynch.

Also possible:

Eli - Soot is voting him and he is my first choice. Mag is also suspicious of him. We should lynch him now because it will only become more difficult to lynch him on later days.

Magorian - Pizza is voting him, Vieira said he'd choose him over Pizza, and a couple of other players expressed some suspicion on him. To be honest, I doubt this wagon will happen. It already lost momentum.

So, am I missing something?
 
Xardob 说:
The top candidates:

Pizza - Llandy says no. There are some things I need to think about regarding some of the things Pizza has done and said, and I need time to think about them, and I need to see more play from him.

Soot - I think Mags may possibly vote here, and maybe Vieira too. But Mag is really holding out for a Pizza lynch and I think as long as a Pizza lynch seems feasible he's not going to fully support a Soot lynch.

Eli - I share Mag's suspicion, but the fact that Soot is so willing to vote him make me wary. But Eli seems to have dropped out of the game entirely, and since MaHuD's made no mention of a possible replacement and given what little play Eli has provided, I'd settle for him if I can't get enough votes on Soot. Lurkers ruin games, and suspicious lurkers are the worst.

Magorian - Llandy also says no. Magorian's had a much better half of Day 1, and he's making some good observations even if I don't always agree with his conclusions.



@MaHuD

Any word from Hawk?

 
后退
顶部 底部