Xardob said:Oh, it's that time of the year again. This will be a fun day.
Arch3r said:Well, this makes it more confusing to read who post what, with the April 1st going on. Still no internet so still typing on phone (which makes quoting and stuff way too difficult, so I will skip that).
But to answer the question a bit, I figured I had to change my vote to either Marowit or Fishy to reach a majority. Leaving my vote on Jock wouldn't help. So, I changed my vote (not the same as changing my mind I would say).
When deciding between just the two of them, it wasn't a very easy choice, but I thought Fishy had a higher chance to be a wolf. Marowit could be explained mostly by inactivity and a road trip. Fishy on the other hand said more conflicting stuff, that made me put big questionmarks at his role. I could go more into this "Fishy vs Marowit" if needed, but then I will wait for ability to quote.
Sorry for being short and vague. I just moved countries yesterday evening. Bit busy times that should be okay in a few days.
Big McLarge-Huge said:vote: all those fu**ing ponys
Jock said:Oh for **** sake. Can I really be arsed to shift through all these names and avatars now? Find out tonight.
Big McLarge-Huge said:Signatures, custom titles, MP names all do the trick. I'm still Brownie O'Neigh
Arch3r said:Unvote Jock, Vote TheFlyingFishy
A lack of explanation in the original vote is what makes it suspicious though. Even typing something like: "With the deadline being 6 hours away, I think it is unlikely that Jock will get lynched and between Fishy and Marowit I think Fishy has the higher chance of being a wolf" alongside your vote would have been okay-ish. But with a complete lack of description, it is more suggestive of a bombvote to rid yourself of a villager.Arch3r said:Well, this makes it more confusing to read who post what, with the April 1st going on. Still no internet so still typing on phone (which makes quoting and stuff way too difficult, so I will skip that).
But to answer the question a bit, I figured I had to change my vote to either Marowit or Fishy to reach a majority. Leaving my vote on Jock wouldn't help. So, I changed my vote (not the same as changing my mind I would say).
When deciding between just the two of them, it wasn't a very easy choice, but I thought Fishy had a higher chance to be a wolf. Marowit could be explained mostly by inactivity and a road trip. Fishy on the other hand said more conflicting stuff, that made me put big questionmarks at his role. I could go more into this "Fishy vs Marowit" if needed, but then I will wait for ability to quote.
Sorry for being short and vague. I just moved countries yesterday evening. Bit busy times that should be okay in a few days.
Yes, it isDago Wolfrider said:Big McLarge-Huge said:Signatures, custom titles, MP names all do the trick. I'm still Brownie O'Neigh
On heavy drugs, judging by your pony avatar. One of the best pony gifs I have seen so far.
That's not your real name, is it?
You are suspicious of me largely because of something Xardob said about me.Dago Wolfrider said:Before voting Jock I want to hear the reasons behind his quite fast and radical change of mind.
Jock said:Adaham on the other hand is just Adaham and he seems hairy.Dago Wolfrider said:Before voting Jock I want to hear the reasons behind his quite fast and radical change of mind.
Fishy getting killed also disproved Marowit's theory...
My pet theory is that he and Adaham are pack mates, so he posted that to get pressure off Adaham since he had most votes at that point. After that it's been many words but little substance posts.
You are suspicious of me largely because of something Xardob said about me.
(https://forums.taleworlds.com/index.php/topic,382516.msg9091371.html#msg9091371)Just a minute ago you were all Fishy, and now it's Archer suddenly? I mean, it's fine if you want to prod people yourself, but this is like you seem more concerned that WE talk about other people, than you trying to get them to do something.
Yet before the day's end Xardob very strongly pushed for a vote on someone who turned out to be innocent. I am not saying it was a lazy bandwagon but it definitely seemed a bit convenient.
He was too cautious and he kept saying obvious things, his accuse against Arch3r was based on his joke/vote, he did not participate much at the beginning, he overreacted to my insinuations and started accusing me of things I never wrote, because he misinterpreted what I wrote, while he could have simply asked me to explain myself better.
(https://forums.taleworlds.com/index.php/topic,382516.msg9091314.html#msg9091314)So here are the current proposed options they way I interpreted the last two pages (feel free to let me know if it's wrong):
1. We lynch Biggie and he's innocent: Xardob is Wolf
2. We lynch Xardob and he's innocent: Biggie is Wolf.
3. We lynch Dago and he's innocent: repeat step one or two.
I'd also like to remind y'all that there are 9 people in the game, both regarding votes and our current suspects. We also have plenty of time right now which I would use for discussion rather than haphazardly throwing votes without any reasoning.
(https://forums.taleworlds.com/index.php/topic,382516.msg9091348.html#msg909134It's the second time that Jock highlights the fact that we have a lot of time ahead. So aut he is a wolf that wants to be seen as an innocent aut an innocent that is desperately trying not to be lynched, while no one is seriously voting for him in both cases. Yet he may even be sincerely trying not to have an innocent lynched.
The most voted players where Xardob and Big McLarge-Huge. (https://forums.taleworlds.com/index.php/topic,382516.msg9091424.html#msg9091424)His reminder that there are more people to discuss about without actually striking any new ground isn't good (it could be a wolf trying to signal his innocence), but a wolf would probably be happy with restricted discussion unless his packmate was under heavy fire. But if this was the case, you'd expect a more concerted effort in shifting focus.
MaHuD said:To be fair to Jock, I find it highly likely that either Xardob or Adaham is a wolf, due to the Eternal kill last night
(https://forums.taleworlds.com/index.php/topic,382516.msg9090371.html#msg9090371)These few pages have plenty of content already. You could have a decent read on half the players, based on their contributions.
(https://forums.taleworlds.com/index.php/topic,382516.msg9091412.html#msg9091412)The truth is I have no idea what to think about Archer, so i'm asking around for opinions. I know it seems insane to think you guys can better determine someone's role than I, but it doesn't hurt to try.
(https://forums.taleworlds.com/index.php/topic,382516.msg9094611.html#msg9094611)I'm going to be honest with you, I have no idea who the wolves could be anymore. I trust you and Vieira, everyone else I can think of reasons to be a wolf. I'm voting Archer because I want my theories about him from day one to be true, not because I'm particularly convinced about his guilty. So feel free to lead the charge, today.
(https://forums.taleworlds.com/index.php/topic,382516.msg9092598.html#msg909259Can we at least wait for our inactive people (that's Vieira and Eternal right now, right?) to get a word in? Would hate to let lurkers get off the hook on the first day again.
So you're saying that me making an effort to actually get my suspect lynched is suspicious? What should have I done, just conveniently suspect people and never actually get them lynched, like some players I could mention?Jock said:Xardob and Adaham are both experienced hunters who seem to be as lost as the rest of us at the moment. Yet before the day's end Xardob very strongly pushed for a vote on someone who turned out to be innocent. I am not saying it was a lazy bandwagon but it definitely seemed a bit convenient.
Lazy wolf is lazy.Adaham on the other hand is just Adaham and he seems hairy.
That being said I also am suspicious about everyone else with Dago being on the bottom rung of my list.
Vieira may have posted little, but what he posted is a villager trying to solve for wolves. Innocent.Dago Wolfrider said:Xardob trusts The Doge of Benis (https://forums.taleworlds.com/index.php/topic,382516.msg9094611.html#msg9094611), yet he did not write much, game talking ( no blame ). A wise hunter should be a bit suspectful of this behavior
I don't think Jock ever voted me.he supports me because Jock voted him
And just when I started trusting you...MaHuD said:To be fair to Jock, I find it highly likely that either Xardob or Adaham is a wolf, due to the Eternal kill last night
I understand, I just decided to change it about 5 minutes before I had to leave to the airport. I figured I could explain later.MaHuD said:Arch3r said:Unvote Jock, Vote TheFlyingFishy
A lack of explanation in the original vote is what makes it suspicious though. Even typing something like: "With the deadline being 6 hours away, I think it is unlikely that Jock will get lynched and between Fishy and Marowit I think Fishy has the higher chance of being a wolf" alongside your vote would have been okay-ish. But with a complete lack of description, it is more suggestive of a bombvote to rid yourself of a villager.Arch3r said:Well, this makes it more confusing to read who post what, with the April 1st going on. Still no internet so still typing on phone (which makes quoting and stuff way too difficult, so I will skip that).
But to answer the question a bit, I figured I had to change my vote to either Marowit or Fishy to reach a majority. Leaving my vote on Jock wouldn't help. So, I changed my vote (not the same as changing my mind I would say).
When deciding between just the two of them, it wasn't a very easy choice, but I thought Fishy had a higher chance to be a wolf. Marowit could be explained mostly by inactivity and a road trip. Fishy on the other hand said more conflicting stuff, that made me put big questionmarks at his role. I could go more into this "Fishy vs Marowit" if needed, but then I will wait for ability to quote.
Sorry for being short and vague. I just moved countries yesterday evening. Bit busy times that should be okay in a few days.
Can you explain why?MaHuD said:To be fair to Jock, I find it highly likely that either Xardob or Adaham is a wolf, due to the Eternal kill last night
As I said man, I can't fault you entirely for getting Fishy lynched. There was little time and if it had come down to it, I would have cast the dooming vote myself. I just did not find the situation to be as time sensitive as you made it. It is always a slippery slope looking back at day one and making conclusions based on who voted to get an innocent lynched.Xardob said:So you're saying that me making an effort to actually get my suspect lynched is suspicious? What should have I done, just conveniently suspect people and never actually get them lynched, like some players I could mention?
I also find this weird. I am kind of suspecting Xardob and the Doge as a pair now.Jock said:How are you so convinced Vieira is innocent? I haven't seen anything that certain from him and would currently rank him above Arch3r and MaHuD due to lack of posts.
Xardob said:So you're saying that me making an effort to actually get my suspect lynched is suspicious? What should have I done, just conveniently suspect people and never actually get them lynched, like some players I could mention?Jock said:Xardob and Adaham are both experienced hunters who seem to be as lost as the rest of us at the moment. Yet before the day's end Xardob very strongly pushed for a vote on someone who turned out to be innocent. I am not saying it was a lazy bandwagon but it definitely seemed a bit convenient.
I don't think Jock ever voted me.he supports me because Jock voted him
Xardob - Suspicious. Naturally, posting a lot gives a lot of stuff to be suspicious about. Probably that's also why people have found me suspicious, as I spoke my mind (especially on the first days). And at least tried to stir up some conversation, if nothing else. If I try to read him as innocent, I feel like Xardob might be in the same boat. If I try to read him as wolf, I feel like he's trying to manipulate the village by trying to lead the votes and intimidating other players with an attitude that says "come after me and I'll lead all the votes against you".
Which is why I urge Dago to consider scenarios where neither Xardob or I are wolves, because I am not sure of X-man's guilt myself.