Since I hate playing with a mass of quotes where the real points get lost in no time, I'll just explain why I suspect you AWdeV:
You started an attack on Ejnomad. Nothing wrong with that, since he had given something of a reason for it. However, the problem is how you started it with twisting his points.
Then you go on about how Ejnomad wants to get rid of Magorian, even though he had yet to even say he found Magorian to be a likely wolf. He brought up points about Magorian, but he didn't judge that it couldn't be anything but villainous actions.
Then you mention the obvious thing; Ej was being aggressive. How does this make anyone suspicious on it's own? Was he being too aggressive? Maybe, but it was an attempt to create discussion and for him to progress that was required.
Basically, your attack was based on what would appear to be misunderstanding. You misunderstood a lot, aye. On purpose.
Then, when Ejnomad rationally answers to your bull****, comes the "ahahaha, got you!" post. Because your nonexistant points were easily handled you had to make an effort to make it seems like you actually still had something on your attack, with seeming confident.
You claim that you were confident. However, why make such an effort to seem so, then?
Oh, because you like smileys!
... FFS, I made my point as clear as possible, so your joke isn't a pleasing answer. You weren't confident because you had nothing to be confident about. You just want to it to seem otherwise.
Now then, it seems like you decided that the random bull****ting wasn't working? We got an actual answer!
Which was filled with twisting facts, and some more bull**** about how you didn't understand my point, because you judged it a good way to try to convince me that I missjudged your post? Still not buying it, since the effort put to it was way too clear.
Then add how you speak about Ej's vote on Magorian, which never happened, and for example this:
"I don't like YOUR attempts of underhandedly and sneakily convincing people that I'm no good."
After you attacked Ejnomad without a bit of reasoning, I think he has quite a good reason to try convincing people that you don't have anything against him. Because it's a fact.
The rest is basically you just trying to brush away his points with words like "hypocrisy". Which you wouldn't need to do if you actually had to counter his points with.
Yeah, my vote is staying.
You started an attack on Ejnomad. Nothing wrong with that, since he had given something of a reason for it. However, the problem is how you started it with twisting his points.
Now, everyone loves exaggerating a bit, but how the **** do you twist Ejnomad's comments on how he didn't like what Magorian was doing to him saying that Magorian was clearly a wolf because he didn't act like Ej prefers to? Ejnomad presented his ideas vocally, maybe saying at points that Magorian's actions were suspicious, but not once he claimed his style was the only way to do it, and that Magorian was a sure wolf.AWdeV 说:
Then you go on about how Ejnomad wants to get rid of Magorian, even though he had yet to even say he found Magorian to be a likely wolf. He brought up points about Magorian, but he didn't judge that it couldn't be anything but villainous actions.
Then you mention the obvious thing; Ej was being aggressive. How does this make anyone suspicious on it's own? Was he being too aggressive? Maybe, but it was an attempt to create discussion and for him to progress that was required.
Basically, your attack was based on what would appear to be misunderstanding. You misunderstood a lot, aye. On purpose.
Then, when Ejnomad rationally answers to your bull****, comes the "ahahaha, got you!" post. Because your nonexistant points were easily handled you had to make an effort to make it seems like you actually still had something on your attack, with seeming confident.
You claim that you were confident. However, why make such an effort to seem so, then?
Oh, because you like smileys!
... FFS, I made my point as clear as possible, so your joke isn't a pleasing answer. You weren't confident because you had nothing to be confident about. You just want to it to seem otherwise.
Now then, it seems like you decided that the random bull****ting wasn't working? We got an actual answer!
Which was filled with twisting facts, and some more bull**** about how you didn't understand my point, because you judged it a good way to try to convince me that I missjudged your post? Still not buying it, since the effort put to it was way too clear.
Then add how you speak about Ej's vote on Magorian, which never happened, and for example this:
"I don't like YOUR attempts of underhandedly and sneakily convincing people that I'm no good."
After you attacked Ejnomad without a bit of reasoning, I think he has quite a good reason to try convincing people that you don't have anything against him. Because it's a fact.
The rest is basically you just trying to brush away his points with words like "hypocrisy". Which you wouldn't need to do if you actually had to counter his points with.
Yeah, my vote is staying.
