MaHuD 说:The only way I can know that Adaham is a wolf whilst being evil, is by being his packmate. Yet he aggrees that I'm not his packmate.
I think we have already established that you are not a wolf; that isn't the question. The main question is are you a seer, plain innocent, or the magic user.
If I am the magic user, why would I first declare Adaham's death, and then kill him in the night?
A few reasons: First, you may have declared to try and actually get him lynched. Possibly by being so bold, you were thinking to get at least one more voter on him. Secondly, since he ended up not being lynched, you may have wanted to eliminate opposition before they eliminated you.
The logical solution, which both Adaham and Xardob thought of, is that I am actually the seer.
Because if I am the seer, I can know that Adaham is a wolf. But I may lack the "physicial" evidence to back this up.
The only flaw to that is; why didn't I roleclaim?
I am pretty sure everyone was thinking you could be a seer by the statements you were making, and lack of evidence. I have no idea why you didn't roleclaim, or if this post is even a roleclaim itself. The only thing I do know is that dealing with you is always a tricky situation.
So really, there is no reason that Xardob votes for me. Not any reason that supports the villagers anyway.
I can still see a reason based off my thoughts on you: you haven't said anything of use until now, you have been giving no backing to your votes, you have been completely vague to whole time, etc.
Icy Fresh Werewolf 说:First, I never said all leaders are wolves. You already know about his aggressiveness and such, he was leading a bit too "over the top" I suppose you could say. I brought together my evidence to infer that he was the wolf.Facemelter 说:As far as Adaham goes, he acts as a leader pretty much every game; you can't use that to deduct "all leaders are wolves."
Hyperbole to get a point across. It is difficult to vote for some "leaders" because it is a toss up between whether they are good or bad. You could say Ej was too "over the top" in being aggressive as well (when he was playing), but he ended up being the bodyguard. That is why I do not look merely at attitudes themselves with trying to figure out peoples' alignments.
Second, you can't get all suspicious of a person because they voted for the guy that happened to be the wolf, now can you? Well, you can, but it's not the best thing to do in my opinion.
Why is it not a good idea? Shouldn't we be considering all possibilities? There are times when wolves vote for each other to throw people off. How can an innocent know when or how often this happens? Adaham was in the position where there wasn't enough votes to lynch him, so it still is a possibility his packie was one of those votes on him.
I know that you don't understand my way of thinking and the evidence I bring up, but as I said before, I do. My guess turned out to be right. Perhaps something to think about in future games?
And my guess on Temu turned out to be correct last game, so what? That is a bit of a cocky statement you made. You end up making one correct guess and are now entitled to tell others how they should play the game and who to listen to?
I assumed it was obvious, apparently not. Do you remember Xardob's previous relationship with Adaham? Now, you should be able to think of it from there. If not, keep trying, it's for your own good.
*See previous statement
Since you are the one who keeps talking about "evidence," I would like to see some, or at least expand on the idea. I am not the one who is thinking Xardob is a wolf right now, so it wouldn't make sense for me to look back at quotes that I am going to say "so what" to. You need to be explaining your arguments, not me. I know they were agreeing with each other, but at times I was agreeing with them too.
Now, about MaHuD and his "wolfish" behaviour: You're right, he isn't showing much about his thoughts (at least until now), but I feel that the fact that he's still being active in the discussions counters that, it shows he's not lurking, which is a strategy some wolves will use. Even his use of one-liners makes me believe he might be innocent, as he is clearly not afraid to show wolfish behaviour, whereas a wolf would usually be much more sensitive. He is being a bit aggressive, but not overly.
How can he be an active part of discussions without sharing his thoughts? How does making one-liners make him more innocent in your eyes when his playstyle typically always smells wolfish? Why would wolves be more sensitive and more lurky? How does saying "you are a wolf and will die" not make him overly aggressive?
A lot of what you have stated is never really the case, and how would you know wolf strategies when you have not played a Werewolf game before? What you see as traces of an innocent, I see as traces of a possible bad guy. There is no evidence other than speculation over playstyle here.





