[Werewolf: Archives] Werewolf: The Tower of Games. WEREWOLVES WIN.
- 主题发起人 FrisianDude
- 开始时间
正在查看此主题的用户
Grumph
Sergeant Knight at Arms
Nodscouter 说:
So if I make a theory about you being the wolf, I am not attacking you?
And as I see it, there is quite a few who suspects you. Might just be me who gets the wrong signals, but whatever thought you like the best.
Posting restriction, or lurking. It could be both, I dunno. I just started, but in the (two) other WW threads I read, there wasn't any posting restrictions really. And how would he not be able to post because someone saved him during the night? Wouldn't it make more sense if it was someone who attacked him during the night?
Nodscouter
Count
AWdev admitted to lurking, so that's that and I'm dropping that point.
What the **** are you talking about?
Grumph 说:
What the **** are you talking about?
Nodscouter
Count
The thing was, revilo ddin't say that MaHuD was a wolf, or even suggested it. He just said that the attack could have been used as an alibi IF he was a wolf which he never suggested MaHuD was.
FrisianDude
Archduke
Day two. Third votecount.
Facemelter: Xardob
Ejnomad: Nodscouter, Awdev, Adaham.
FIVE DAYS LEFT.
Facemelter: Xardob
Ejnomad: Nodscouter, Awdev, Adaham.
FIVE DAYS LEFT.
Sorry for the inactivity. I looked back a little to refresh my mind. Here goes a little post:
Copying an idea already talked about and pretty much said pointless. Trying to sound smarter?
While I have stated before that Nod should be delt with carefully, but even I am starting to think he is really wolfy:
For some reason, it seems like Nod is trying hard to protect Revilo when Rev isn't even in much danger. Now, I don't want to call "packies" yet, but it seems like a possiblity:
Rev complains that MaHuD didn't vote for Ej on the first day - a bit wolfy. Nod seems to only want Ej dead before doing anything else - a bit wolfy. Nod keeps supporting Rev's theory about MaHuD and says Rev is innocent - maybe a connection between the two. Both voted for Ej on Day 1 IIRC - its not unlikely for a wolfpack to do so to push a lynch.
My theory may seem far-fetched, but a possiblity with how Nod is acting today. He still "knows" Ej is a wolf, apparently. I guess he "knows" Rev is innocent too?
Vote: Nodscouter for the time being.
Nodscouter 说:
Copying an idea already talked about and pretty much said pointless. Trying to sound smarter?
While I have stated before that Nod should be delt with carefully, but even I am starting to think he is really wolfy:
Nodscouter 说:
Nodscouter 说:
For some reason, it seems like Nod is trying hard to protect Revilo when Rev isn't even in much danger. Now, I don't want to call "packies" yet, but it seems like a possiblity:
Rev complains that MaHuD didn't vote for Ej on the first day - a bit wolfy. Nod seems to only want Ej dead before doing anything else - a bit wolfy. Nod keeps supporting Rev's theory about MaHuD and says Rev is innocent - maybe a connection between the two. Both voted for Ej on Day 1 IIRC - its not unlikely for a wolfpack to do so to push a lynch.
My theory may seem far-fetched, but a possiblity with how Nod is acting today. He still "knows" Ej is a wolf, apparently. I guess he "knows" Rev is innocent too?
Vote: Nodscouter for the time being.
Nodscouter
Count
I see you like twisting my words facie?
I was pretty sure that would come up sooner or later that I was ''defending'' revilo, but seriously? I never said ''Yea, revilo is definitely innocent no matter what, there is no ****ing chance in hell that he's a wolf'' which you seem so eager to bend it to. I said that it wasn't overly likely that he was based on his arguments and the like. And I never ''copied'' the idea, I just agreed with the one who said it first and thought I'd bring it up again. And me defending revilo is just ****ing silly. I just asked what part of revilo's argument was off as I myself didn't see it. And xardob asked ME what I thought of revilo, so guess what? I answered. Whoa, big ****ing surprise there huh?
I was pretty sure that would come up sooner or later that I was ''defending'' revilo, but seriously? I never said ''Yea, revilo is definitely innocent no matter what, there is no ****ing chance in hell that he's a wolf'' which you seem so eager to bend it to. I said that it wasn't overly likely that he was based on his arguments and the like. And I never ''copied'' the idea, I just agreed with the one who said it first and thought I'd bring it up again. And me defending revilo is just ****ing silly. I just asked what part of revilo's argument was off as I myself didn't see it. And xardob asked ME what I thought of revilo, so guess what? I answered. Whoa, big ****ing surprise there huh?
It seems you have also become more aggressive recently. Does constant profanity somehow makes your arguements stronger? 
But seriously, if you thought the issue of someone saying that you were defending Revilo would come up, why didn't you address it earlier?
But seriously, if you thought the issue of someone saying that you were defending Revilo would come up, why didn't you address it earlier?
Nodscouter
Count
Facemelter 说:It seems you have also become more aggressive recently. Does constant profanity somehow makes your arguements stronger?
Well excuuuse me for being tired.
Because then everyone would have voted me because I would seem desperate to defend myself?
Okay, lets rewind here.
I know this, but you are constantly defending Revilo it seems.
Nodscouter 说:
I know this, but you are constantly defending Revilo it seems.
Nodscouter
Count
I have been making arguments that have benefited him for what? 0.5-1 page now? That hardly qualifies as constantly, but if it bothers you that much that I'm making arguments, I will stop.
Nodscouter
Count
Hmm... Never really saw it that way but I guess you could be right indeed.
Nodscouter
Count
Nope.
Xardob 说:
He's been dying from the worst case of influenza he thinks he's ever had. It has really drained my willpower to do anything so I'm sorry to everyone for my lack of activity. I'll try to get some post up in the morning, but for now I'm going to bed.
The deadline is approaching, so it's time to lay my suspicions clearly.
My top suspects are AWdeV, Facemelter and Calodine.
AWdeV has focused on Ej the entire game and didn't raise point against anyone else the entire game. It's like he's using this suspicion to hide from the rest of the game. Note how quiet he gets when the discussion moves away from Ej. He's found a comfortable place to act like he's scumhunting, a place where the majority of the village is with him, and disappears when there's something new required from him. This is evident on his opinion about MaHuD. On the same line he doesn't like MaHuD's reason to vote him, then doubt MaHuD is a wolf, then he's not sure. He doesn't take a clear position. It's also interesting that the great part of that same post was returning to a discussion long dead with Nomad. And he doesn't even bring a new point, just the possibility of having one or two packs in the game.
Next one is Cal. I'm suspicious of him comes from Kronic, though Cal hasn't done much to improve my opinion of him. Kronic was basically a no show on the first day. His had only two posts worthy of discussion. His giant post is the most interesting. Although it has a lot of words, there's very little substance there. It's mostly meaningless stuff or agreements with other players. This could be easily an attempt to create the illusion that he's getting involved in the discussion without committing too much. On the same post, he says his top suspect is Ej but never gets to say why. His other post is a handfull of thoughts on a few random players. There isn't much there, but there is on interesting information. Kronic asked Ej to address the points he made about him but didn't give much attention to it once Ej did it. At the end of the day, Kronic voted, a vote that was vital to start the bandwagon, but never explained his reason. Now that I covered Kronic, let's get to Cal. What he has posted so far doesn't impress me, it's mostly neutral stuff. The only suspect he named, he said he was going to hold off for now. Again, an attitude that avoids committing himself to anything.
The final one is Facemelter. The attitude that I find most suspicious about his is the he refuses to stick to a point or pursue it further. It seems everytime he posts, it's about the topic being discussed at the time, he hardly brings something new or get back to one of his previous points. I already addressed his vote on Rev and the fact that he basically dropped the subject on the second day, but the fact that he now chooses to ignore some shaky logic that Rev presented to instead focus on Nod is even more suspicious. He again goes for the topic at hand and totally ignore his previous suspicion. The fact that he suggested that Nod and Rev are on the same pack feels more like an excuse to attack Nod than honest suspicion against Rev. I'd also like to point out the irony present here. The reason he voted Rev on the first day was because he thought Rev was trying to get a bandwagon on an easy target. Now he attacks that same easy target, accusing him of being Rev's packmate. There's something very inconsistent here.
My top suspects are AWdeV, Facemelter and Calodine.
AWdeV has focused on Ej the entire game and didn't raise point against anyone else the entire game. It's like he's using this suspicion to hide from the rest of the game. Note how quiet he gets when the discussion moves away from Ej. He's found a comfortable place to act like he's scumhunting, a place where the majority of the village is with him, and disappears when there's something new required from him. This is evident on his opinion about MaHuD. On the same line he doesn't like MaHuD's reason to vote him, then doubt MaHuD is a wolf, then he's not sure. He doesn't take a clear position. It's also interesting that the great part of that same post was returning to a discussion long dead with Nomad. And he doesn't even bring a new point, just the possibility of having one or two packs in the game.
Next one is Cal. I'm suspicious of him comes from Kronic, though Cal hasn't done much to improve my opinion of him. Kronic was basically a no show on the first day. His had only two posts worthy of discussion. His giant post is the most interesting. Although it has a lot of words, there's very little substance there. It's mostly meaningless stuff or agreements with other players. This could be easily an attempt to create the illusion that he's getting involved in the discussion without committing too much. On the same post, he says his top suspect is Ej but never gets to say why. His other post is a handfull of thoughts on a few random players. There isn't much there, but there is on interesting information. Kronic asked Ej to address the points he made about him but didn't give much attention to it once Ej did it. At the end of the day, Kronic voted, a vote that was vital to start the bandwagon, but never explained his reason. Now that I covered Kronic, let's get to Cal. What he has posted so far doesn't impress me, it's mostly neutral stuff. The only suspect he named, he said he was going to hold off for now. Again, an attitude that avoids committing himself to anything.
The final one is Facemelter. The attitude that I find most suspicious about his is the he refuses to stick to a point or pursue it further. It seems everytime he posts, it's about the topic being discussed at the time, he hardly brings something new or get back to one of his previous points. I already addressed his vote on Rev and the fact that he basically dropped the subject on the second day, but the fact that he now chooses to ignore some shaky logic that Rev presented to instead focus on Nod is even more suspicious. He again goes for the topic at hand and totally ignore his previous suspicion. The fact that he suggested that Nod and Rev are on the same pack feels more like an excuse to attack Nod than honest suspicion against Rev. I'd also like to point out the irony present here. The reason he voted Rev on the first day was because he thought Rev was trying to get a bandwagon on an easy target. Now he attacks that same easy target, accusing him of being Rev's packmate. There's something very inconsistent here.
The reason I went for Nod instead of Rev is becuase Nod's reaction would be a better indicator of if they are packies, to test my theory. Rev is obviously the more level-headed player, and could probably handle the situation with a calm disposition. Nod, on the other hand, doesn't seem to deal with these situations well. If they were to be packies, I would assume that in his reaction there would be more flaws. His reaction was violent, to an extend, and apparently knew the issue of defending Rev's agruements would come up, yet he didn't explain that.
Now to address some of your other points:
I am pretty sure my last post brought up something that is new, or rather, a new interpretation of an old subject. Most of the players aren't bringing up anything "new" per say either, if thats what you think of it. Also, why is discussing what is at hand a bad thing? I am sorry I only looked back five pages to refresh my memory, but a lot of what was going on at the start of Day 2 never struck me as too strange.
Well first off, you would complain by looking at Rev's logic that I wouldn't be presenting anything new
. More seriously, I am not ignoring my previous suspicion; where did I say that? I talked about Rev, did I not? I said he is still suspicious, did I not? As mentioned in the first paragraph I wrote in this post, I pursued Nod becuase I think his reaction would be a bit more telling. It is obvious I still have suspicions of Rev because he was mad Ej didn't get lynched so goes blabbing off about how MaHuD is suspicious for not killing a guy. I find that strange, especially since another person who wanted Ej dead is now agreeing with everything he is saying.
Things change between days, but looking back on it, Revs arguement against Nod on Day 1 wasn't too strong. Packies occassionally will vote on each other, so it isn't strange that such a thing would happen. Plus, in the end Rev changed his vote to Ej. He ignored past suspicion of Nod to try and go for the most likely lynch.
Now to address some of your other points:
Xardob 说:
I am pretty sure my last post brought up something that is new, or rather, a new interpretation of an old subject. Most of the players aren't bringing up anything "new" per say either, if thats what you think of it. Also, why is discussing what is at hand a bad thing? I am sorry I only looked back five pages to refresh my memory, but a lot of what was going on at the start of Day 2 never struck me as too strange.
Well first off, you would complain by looking at Rev's logic that I wouldn't be presenting anything new
. More seriously, I am not ignoring my previous suspicion; where did I say that? I talked about Rev, did I not? I said he is still suspicious, did I not? As mentioned in the first paragraph I wrote in this post, I pursued Nod becuase I think his reaction would be a bit more telling. It is obvious I still have suspicions of Rev because he was mad Ej didn't get lynched so goes blabbing off about how MaHuD is suspicious for not killing a guy. I find that strange, especially since another person who wanted Ej dead is now agreeing with everything he is saying.Things change between days, but looking back on it, Revs arguement against Nod on Day 1 wasn't too strong. Packies occassionally will vote on each other, so it isn't strange that such a thing would happen. Plus, in the end Rev changed his vote to Ej. He ignored past suspicion of Nod to try and go for the most likely lynch.
