FrisianDude
Archduke

I have prodded those who haven't posted on the previous three pages.
Sootshade will be replaced with Grumph.
Sootshade will be replaced with Grumph.


Xardob 说:You've said that it could be a number of things, and also said that it could be all meaningless. I agree with the last part. The important question here is what do you think of MaHuD and Revilo?

MaHuD 说:Revilo 说:3. I'm pretty sure that the poisoned porridge counts as an attack - what else could it be?
I don't know, it could be a lot. For example, some sort of equivelant of a Priest's holy water?
But I suppose it could be an attack yes.
@Xardob
As for Revilo, I already understood that he only wanted information (He posted that somewhere. Somethign like:
I have no information on him at all")
Knowing that, why should I counter attack, when I think he just doing good and tries to get some information?
While it's true that he can still be a villain, it's also true I still have the flue and don't feel like posting much, not that it would be very clear anyway.
Xardob 说:I'm not discounting the possibility either, we've had plenty of crazy wolves before, but there's nothing that leads me to believe this is what happened, so I'd rather go with the simplest explanation that MaHuD was attacked by another pack if he's a wolf. This scenario is much better to work with because MaHuD could be either innocent or a wolf. As long as people are still considering it as a possibility - I wouldn't want any theory to fade into obscurity, especially with the amount of leads we have currently.
That's the important part. What if MaHuD didn't suspect Ej at all? Should he still vote Ej just to get a lynch? If you follow this train of thought, you're giving a huge advantage to the wolves. You're taking away their responsibilities for their votes. How could you have blamed MaHuD in case the lynch was wrong if everything he was doing was in the village's best interest. It wasn't his suspicion, therefore not his fault. I hadn't thought of it that way - it would give the wolves a perfect excuse to act with very little chance of a reproach. Hmm... looking back on my accusations now with this train of thought, I've been walking pretty thin ice - it could easily be misconstrued that I'm a wolf, trying to open up alleyways of escape for other wolves, or just looking for an easier way for a bandwagon. Despite that though, I'm not going to stop pushing for information but I'll definitely be checking and viewing the points from different positions.I'd still like to know how a no-lynch has helped the village, because as far as I can see it's resulted only in the death of an innocent, two failed attacks and still with mere speculation to go on. In regards to the voting, hell, I'm willing to accept that how I suddenly changed my vote is suspicious and pretty consistent with how I suspect a wolf would do it, yet I did it anyway because in my eyes a no-lynch is something to be avoided. I was willing to vote for Ej because he was still suspicious to me, merely not so much as others in the game. However, without the chance of those others being lynched, my vote went to the person who I was still suspcious of, and where my vote could actually make a difference.
Now imagine a slightly different scenario. There are two candidates tied for today's lynch, each with two votes. As the deadline approaches, someone votes for one of those two. Under this reasoning, three wolves have now the perfect excuse to place risk free votes and get an easy lynch. Now tell me how likely is this scenario to happen at the pace the game is going. My guess is very likely.


MaHuD 说:Very well, I read it like this.
1You dislike certain actions of mine, and because you dislike it you suspect me.
2Because I was attacked during the night, I am a wolf. It gives me the oppertunity to say that I am not. (I don't remember saying that I am a cleared innocent due to the attack, I haven't mentioned anything that comes close to that)
The attack also explains my "no-vote".
3There is possibility that I was attacked on purpose by a packmate. (How would we have known that I was going to be protected?)
I didn't mean that you should have counter attacked. It's the lack of any aggressive action at all that bothers me, even to defend yourself you're way too passive. That doesn't seem like your innocent self, and my best guess to this behaviour is that you're more concerned with survival than with finding the wolves. I had forgotten you aren't feeling well, but even then, I can only work with what you give me.MaHuD 说:@Xardob
As for Revilo, I already understood that he only wanted information (He posted that somewhere. Somethign like:
I have no information on him at all")
Knowing that, why should I counter attack, when I think he just doing good and tries to get some information?
While it's true that he can still be a villain, it's also true I still have the flue and don't feel like posting much, not that it would be very clear anyway.
Except that I don't support MaHuD in any way. I attacked Rev's arguments, but I'm still more suspicious of MaHuD than him. I thought I made that clear. Even if this wasn't the case, this wouldn't mean I'm on MaHuD's side.Grumph 说:@Xardob;
You support MaHuD in his case, which could be because you're his packmate or cult comrade or whatever; it could be because you don't like or understand Revilo's points.
You're mistaking me with someone else. I never attacked Ej this game and I'm one of the few players that doesn't list him as a suspect.I also don't like how you handle the case with Ejnomad - it was kinda obvious(for me atleast) that he just wanted to start discussion, yet you jump on him with teeth and claws.
Who do you suspect then? You take the time to discuss a side event that we don't even know if it's relevant, but can't name a single suspect. As things are now, you could vote for anyone when the deadline comes and there would be no way to check if your vote is coherent with your suspicious. And the worst part is that you're far from being the only one.Regendur 说:As for the MaHuD and Rev debate, I don't think either of them are suspicious, at least from their conversation. It'll take more to convince me of that. I apologize, I have not gone back to read through the posts, so I can't revise my LoS yet.

Xardob 说:Except that I don't support MaHuD in any way. I attacked Rev's arguments, but I'm still more suspicious of MaHuD than him. I thought I made that clear. Even if this wasn't the case, this wouldn't mean I'm on MaHuD's side.Grumph 说:@Xardob;
You support MaHuD in his case, which could be because you're his packmate or cult comrade or whatever; it could be because you don't like or understand Revilo's points.
You're mistaking me with someone else. I never attacked Ej this game and I'm one of the few players that doesn't list him as a suspect.I also don't like how you handle the case with Ejnomad - it was kinda obvious(for me atleast) that he just wanted to start discussion, yet you jump on him with teeth and claws.
Yes, yes I was. I apologize.
For Facemelter, and Calodine(Kronic was replaced by Calodine, right I'll get up to you later.

Grumph 说:Xardob 说:Except that I don't support MaHuD in any way. I attacked Rev's arguments, but I'm still more suspicious of MaHuD than him. I thought I made that clear. Even if this wasn't the case, this wouldn't mean I'm on MaHuD's side.Grumph 说:@Xardob;
You support MaHuD in his case, which could be because you're his packmate or cult comrade or whatever; it could be because you don't like or understand Revilo's points.
You're mistaking me with someone else. I never attacked Ej this game and I'm one of the few players that doesn't list him as a suspect.I also don't like how you handle the case with Ejnomad - it was kinda obvious(for me atleast) that he just wanted to start discussion, yet you jump on him with teeth and claws.
Yes, yes I was. I apologize.
For Facemelter, and Calodine(Kronic was replaced by Calodine, right I'll get up to you later.

Grumph 说:DISCLAIMER; I am very tired and have a bad headache, so bear with me if it makes little or no sense at all.
Well, heres my LoS and observations for at start.
Listed in no particular order...
@Revilo;
Your case against MaHud seems... Desperate, at the least. Then again I have to agree with you in some points and cases, which annoys me much. I don't feel any particular bad vibes, but on the other side I don't feel any particular good vibes from you either, which sets in you some neutral stalemate for me. Because I can see and understand your points, but I don't like them. I am going to stick with you as a potential suspect.
@Nodscouter;
What do you expect? In a game like this you need to pull yourself together and create some contributive posts which can be used for discussion. If you are innocent, as you claim, its in your interest that the village gets some discussion going and maybe get together about suspecting someone - infact they've already done that, problem is for you that you are that someone. I'd like a non-provoked post of length from you describing your suspicions to greater detail in updated version. As I see it you're lurking a bit too much. Not high on the list, but definately suspected.
@AWdeV;
You started by posting very aggressively, and then, you ride the ****-storm off and now you don't seem to contribute just as much as you did before... Why is that I wonder?

my best guess to this behaviour is that you're more concerned with survival than with finding the wolves.


ejnomad07 说:AWdeV 说:How did you infer two packs from the narration? I mean, yes, there's two seperate attacks mentioned (three if you count my nasty porridge) but that's all. They could easily be on the same pack. But no, that can't be! That way you couldn't ALSO insinuate I'm a wolf! Great googeldy-moogeldy, is this really how you're going to play the damn game? You've got everything thought out for yourself and everything neatly fits together? And, ofcourse, anyone who disagrees gets a minute of hate from you.
At any time, anyone could come up with grand theories like you're doing here but it's odd how it's all so perfect and shiny and you're the victim. In fact, OMGUS be damned, this whole crap makes you look even more suspicious to me. Vote: Ejnomad.
Two attacks two packs. Doesn't take a rocket scientist. Each group only gets to pick one target for their pack each night. That's how the point of the game pretty much works 99.9% of the time. Unless, I see a moderator that ****s the rules up otherwise I am going to assume they keep to the normal of these kind of games. Besides a scum pack that gets to kill two people every night is hellish overpowered to the town that only gets to kill one person each day. I would at least think you would know the traditional rules where each side kills 1 person in day and night cycles.