[Werewolf: Archives] Werewolf: The Tower of Games. WEREWOLVES WIN.

正在查看此主题的用户

Adaham 说:
No, you got my point pretty well. And while there´s nothing wrong with maybe re-reading some stuff, I find it striking that while there is a rather heated discussion going on, you kind of pull out of it by promising to do some archeology. Also, the topics haven´t really changed much, as we didn´t get a lynch yesterday (and so no way of putting people´s suspicions to a test) and the only person that died was basically a no-show.

Whilst I agree the topics haven't changed to any significant degree, I feel it's worth checking to see if there's anything to be gleaned from the target choices and night events before making a move. It could end up being a complete waste of time, but that doesn't make it unworth checking.

As for the my stance, I'll be honest and say I'm not overly sure of where suspicion is best cast. Yes, that's not the best thing to say, but it is accurate as of right now. Part of the re-read is to allow myself to get everything in order for myself. If I had to vote this instant, I'd go for Ej, as he was the most suspicious to me at the close of day, but I've kept my vote for the day till I recheck him. I don't believe he's a poor enough player that were he a wolf he would levae clues, and I believe it's likely that Mags was chosen precisely because he wouldn't leave a noticeable trail. I'm not implying you advocate it, but we have a full day ahead of us and plenty of time to discuss this and check things up.

As ever, thanks for the queries. I work a lot better with direct questioning.
 
Well, I haven't seen him play since the All-Stars game, and I don't remember much of that. And Frisian still hasn't answered my Q: When is today's deadline at the hour?
 
Adaham 说:
Probably true on that, but since he´s been hosting too and he´s clearly experienced (plus we´ve PMed sometimes in the past), I was just assuming that this is his standard playing style. Usually peoples posting styles don´t change gravely.

While this might sound cynical, it isn´t meant to be, but allow me to ask: what point were you trying to make now? That Ejnomad is after all a rather new player? I don´t quite get it...
No not at all, what I mean is that in Tavern of Terror, I think yes he was being vocal, but the attention was on me. A lot easier to be talking a lot when the attention is not towards you. Altough I do think I remember that he wasn't clear of any suspicion, there were still people suspecting him. But memory is no guarentee :razz:
 
Right, here we go

Sootshade - Troll is behaving weird. Despite his claim that he sees the situation with AWdeV the same way it was with Vulkan last time, his argument against Vulkan was a lot better and he was successful in building a good case. Now he just supports his case with gut feeling and AWdeV's false confidence. The attack is strong, but it doesn't have much substance. While this isn't exactly bad, his lack of suspicion on other players doesn't make it very good. The only time he was suspicious of someone else was in his LoS, and even there he wasn't very vocal about it. His sudden drop on AWdev's case to compromise with the village to lynch Ej completes the scenario of not so good things he's done. All of this makes me think he doesn't really want AWdeV lynched, which means he's a wolf attacking a packmate and changing his vote to someone else when the opportunity arose. Of course, if AWdeV is innocent, Troll seems much better, but some points still apply.

Adaham - I don't know what to say about him. I don't share his suspicion on Ej and I agree that he is less active in the wolfhunt than usual. I agree with most of his other points, especially about Kronic. I have plenty of other suspects right now, so I'm not too worried about Adaham. Just wait and watch him for now.

Regendur - I don't have much to work with him and nothing that he posted jumped at me as wolfish, which is a good thing. If I had to point something suspicious about him, would be his reaction to the vote Adaham placed on him, something too small near what some of the other players are showing and likely of no consequence.

Facemelter - Odd entrance. While i don't like his suggestion to leave Nod alone, I can understand and accept it. His vote on Revilo is a different matter. A very weak argument that he didn't pursued very strongly after that. He even ended the day voting him, but made no attempt at further pressure or trying to get his target lynched. This leaves me with the impression he was just looking for a place to dump his vote, and the new guy attacking the other new guy seemed like a good one. He even got away with it. So far he's looking like a perfect lurker wolf.

AWdeV - His first attack on Ej didn't make much sense. The claim that Ej was being too aggressive towards Magorian and trying to get rid of him was a very big stretch. AWdeV also made a few mistakes on his claims, like when he said Ej had voted for Mag. This looks like AWdeV found an opportunity to attack someone and went for it. But it misfired, and to keep it up he had to make a few mistakes. Had he stopped after the first attack to gather his thoughts, I wouldn't be so suspicious of him. But the continuous attack and focus only on Ej isn't very good. I also didn't like his comment on Mag's death. A likely wolf.

Ejnomad - Usually I'd be very suspicious of a discussion on metagaming like his discussion with Mag, but Ej used this to start hunting, so no big deal there. He made a very good job on starting discussion, but I do get lost sometimes with all the quotes and his change of directions. The fact that he usually is in a discussion with several players at once only contributes to the confusion. I'd like to see a more focused post from him, so that things can get cleared up a bit. The only post that worried me was the one he advised Troll to drop the attack on AWdeV.

Kronic - My feeling with Kronic is that he's riding along. Shows up when there's some activity and usually goes unnoticed. His big post was a nice way to show activity without committing to much. He has only attacked Ej so far, which goes nicely with riding along with the village. His vote was crucial to get the bandwagon on Ej rolling, as it made him the clear leader in votes and, at that point, the only one to likely be lynched. The fact that he now is backing away from his accusation and stalling contribution with analyses of past posts only makes me more suspicious of him.

Revilo - He's doing a good job so far. Looking at various players and making logical arguments. I only have to object to him dropping the pressure on Nod and adopting a more passive approach towards him as it kind of defeated the purpose of the investigation.

MaHuD - I don't like his behaviour on the first day. Too cautious and absent to be the MaHuD I know. This could be because he knows he gets lynched a lot, and so is adopting a more cautious stance. If this is the case, this is a sign of wolfishness. But he's much more active now, so I'll wait some more before deciding.

Nodscouter - Lurker that appears when under suspicion. Nothing out of the ordinary there. I didn't like how he just copied AWdeV's reason to vote Ej. When he voted Ej again at the start of this day, I thought he was going to use it as an excuse to park his vote and hide behind it for the rest of the game, or at least until Ej was dead. I'm still not sure if this isn't the case, but his reaction to pressure this day eased my mind a bit. I'd like him to say what he thinks about some of the other players, to get a better read on him.

Unvote, Vote Facemelter.
 
Regendur 说:
Well, I haven't seen him play since the All-Stars game, and I don't remember much of that. And Frisian still hasn't answered my Q: When is today's deadline at the hour?
Beats me. Somewhere towards the end of the year. Or, well, let's say 3rd of January, because I doubt many people will be playing during Christmas and Old/New years.
If that's not clear enough, how would me stating an hour make it more clear than stating the day? You had 15 (!) days to vote, but without thinking about timezone difference (you are from America, yeah?) you chose to not-vote until the very last day, you can hardly blame me for not voting. I am somewhat peeved that you do seem to choose to blame me.
If you postpone something for school to the very last day and then your printer dies you can't blame the printer for not turning it the school-work in on time.
 
FrisianDude 说:
Beats me. Somewhere towards the end of the year. Or, well, let's say 3rd of January, because I doubt many people will be playing during Christmas and Old/New years.
If that's not clear enough, how would me stating an hour make it more clear than stating the day? You had 15 (!) days to vote, but without thinking about timezone difference (you are from America, yeah?) you chose to not-vote until the very last day, you can hardly blame me for not voting. I am somewhat peeved that you do seem to choose to blame me.
If you postpone something for school to the very last day and then your printer dies you can't blame the printer for not turning it the school-work in on time.
Since you're so prudent as to use a school example, I shall use one in return. If the teacher does not state when an assignment is due, but on a day-long range and seemingly randomly chooses to end the deadline, the fault lies with the teacher. Especially if when it is convenient for the teacher to call for assignments, half of the students are sleeping, working, whatever, due to time-zone differences.

Clear communication is what holds competitive games like this together, and the absence of which plagued the Nations' Cup and caused it to fall apart. An hour needs to be stated because of these time-zone differences, or else we'll have confusion and this unnecessary argument again. Now if you'll excuse me, I'm going to bed.
 
Adaham - I'm somewhat wary of him right now, but I can't quite think of anything specific. He just overall doesn't feel as clearly innocent as some others. Still, for now I can't really see much but proper arguments. I don't think he's a wolf, right now, but I not comfortable with all he says either. Let's say I can't make up my mind regarding him just yet.

Regendur - While he's yet to show any particular commitment and I can't really judge him, I don't get any bad feeling from him either. I'd say he feels innocent right now, but I'd like to see more.

Facemelter - I get the feeling that all he's really done was dumping his vote on Revilo with quite a horrible argument. His point about letting Nod work without pressure was acceptable, but it should have been clear that Revilo wasn't aiming for lynching Nod. Besides, the fact that I can't really remember anything else from him seems odd. I smell lurking, just as does Xardob.

Ejnomad - I'm starting to get a bad feeling from him. I really don't see much at the other arguments against him but Adaham's might just be right. It seems like Ej is trying to make everything fit what he said, even if the posts he uses for that don't even have anything to do with it. At this point I'm not quite sure what to think of him as I otherwise see him doing his share of the work for the village and actually working towards catching villains, even if what he said on Nod seems a bit too much like a search for an easy target.

Kronic - I still can't say much about him. I don't get any wolfy vibes, but he's yet to actually convince me with his commitment for the village either. I'll have to wait to see more.

Revilo - I like being cautious before naming anyone innocent, but to be honest I feel like doing that with Revilo right now. He's participating the discussion very well and his arguments are good, even though I'd say that his lack of experience shows to some extent. He's yet to show anything I'd count wolfish, but he's shown lots to make me believe he's an innocent.

Xardob - I like. I'd say he seems like the normal Xardob for now, with good smell for anything wolfish. Obviously not going to guess the role just yet, but I'm actually pretty happy to have him in the game. Might bring some live to the village's scum hunt. I agree with most of what he's said until now, and Dryvus didn't give me any bad feeling either, so at this point I don't see him suspicious.

MaHuD - Aside the normal confusement, I feel something's not exactly right with MaHuD. My gut isn't even screaming "wolf!" like usual, but his excuse for not committing the first day was simply horrifyingly wolfish. He basically just skipped the first day, so he'd better show something to make me think he's not a wolf, today. The last vote, however, left me confused. I'd love to hear if he's actually agreeing with me, but it seemed pretty odd. Maybe he really didn't realize that the deadline was just about to pass. If not, he simply didn't feel comfortable lynching ejnomad. Anyways, I want to hear why he voted for AWdeV.

Nodscouter - I've got to admit that at the moment I don't really think Nod is a wolf. Or, well, the chance doesn't seem that high, really. Still, he truly needs to work on his arguments a lot. He's already started working towards that direction, but it all seems at the best just shoddy to me. While I agree with him about something, I really don't find anything he says really convincing right now. Still, how he reacted when pressured makes me think he's actually as convinced about what he says as he seems to be.



A slightly better, and a bit updated try at a LoS. As you can see, I've not even mentioned AWdeV there, though. Right now I'm just trying to get an overview and gather my thoughts. But unless something worth discussion shows up, my next post should be about him.

 
As others have done, I reckon an updated LoS is needed to get my thoughts in order instead of just rolling around in my head. Just to let you know to expect one from me later today.

Also, quick question that has been nagging me. OMGUS = Oh My God You Suck? Or am I way off the mark here?
 
So what kind of situation would cause a reply to be OMGUS? I've seen it thrown around and think I've sort of understood it, but clarification would be nice.
 
Person A: [Careful post analysing why person B is likely guilty, likely ending in a vote]
Person B: You think I'm a wolf, you're totally trying to get a bandwaggon on me for a lynch, so you're guilty! Vote: A!

In short, where you vote someone because they're attacking you.

'Least that's how I'd put it.
 
Adaham 说:
@MaHuD´s last vote yesterday: When he voted AWdeV last thing on day 1, I suddenly started thinking of last game when Snoopy had finished off whoever-it-was on day 1 and MaHuD immediately pointed the finger at her and called her behaviour out as extremely wolfish. He was right about that and we knew soon thereafter.

I was thinking that too, but he also could have just not voted if he really is a wolf. I think he is more or less and innocent at this point, and the random inactivity with a sudden vote before time expired was just to show hes still here.

Adaham 说:
I find it striking that while there is a rather heated discussion going on, you kind of pull out of it by promising to do some archeology. Also, the topics haven´t really changed much, as we didn´t get a lynch yesterday (and so no way of putting people´s suspicions to a test) and the only person that died was basically a no-show.

Well, I plan on doing this as well, but what are you complaining about? I think you may have agreed to this before, but as Xardob and Ej believe: Day 1 is the best day to figure out what someone's role is. Is there something on Day 1 you don't want Kronic to see? It shouldn't be much of a problem, since these posts on Day 2 thus far have been fairly short and easy reads; if Kronic falls behind, I am sure he can get caught up.

Xardob 说:
Facemelter - Odd entrance. While i don't like his suggestion to leave Nod alone, I can understand and accept it. His vote on Revilo is a different matter. A very weak argument that he didn't pursued very strongly after that. He even ended the day voting him, but made no attempt at further pressure or trying to get his target lynched. This leaves me with the impression he was just looking for a place to dump his vote, and the new guy attacking the other new guy seemed like a good one. He even got away with it. So far he's looking like a perfect lurker wolf.

I'll try to explain the Revillo thing once more: Well, at the point I entered the game in, the main discussions that were going on were against Nod, which were started more or less by Revillo. I don't have a problem with that. However the was he kept pressing him really felt like, to me, he was trying to start a bandwagon of sorts since Nod is an easy target. It is a bit weak, I will give you that, but in the end he switched his vote to Ej close to the end of the day. So he puts all his effort into Nod, and then votes for Ej, setting up the final vote for his lynch? That struck me as quite odd, so didn't bother to switch it elsewhere before the day ended.

Even though I read everything up to the point where I entered, its hard for me to follow everything that was going on. Not in the sense that I didn't understand it, but because I wasn't an active part of the discussions I don't have a good sense or feeling of the posts themselves. I didn't have the same feel for Ej or AW or Soot (etc.) whose main discussions were a bit before my entrance, than as I did for Nod, Ej in his later posts, Revilo, etc.

I hope that clears it up. Sorry it seems I have been lurking as well. I have been finishing college applications this weekend and while I have been on the forums, I only am reading snippets before I go back to writing the essays and filling out the forms.
 
Kronic 说:
Person A: [Careful post analysing why person B is likely guilty, likely ending in a vote]
Person B: You think I'm a wolf, you're totally trying to get a bandwaggon on me for a lynch, so you're guilty! Vote: A!

In short, where you vote someone because they're attacking you.

'Least that's how I'd put it.

Ah that's pretty much how I envisioned it, thanks.
 
@Frisian,
please put the links to the nights/days in the first post
http://forums.taleworlds.com/index.php/topic,147414.msg3601107.html#msg3601107 (first day/night)

Helps a lot when reading back.




Adaham, how would you explain that both "targets" can be related to both Nomad and Awdev?
There would be no reason to eat me during the night, as currently there are plenty of people suspicious of me, the only reason is Awdev and Nomad.
Magorian was immediately linked to have been eaten by Awdev by Nomad.
 
Regendur 说:
Since you're so prudent as to use a school example, I shall use one in return. If the teacher does not state when an assignment is due, but on a day-long range and seemingly randomly chooses to end the deadline, the fault lies with the teacher.
Wait, what? In all my school-life I have never seen a specific time of the specified day of the deadline on any work to turn in. Fine though, this is not what should be argued about, and I'm not the one who ought to be arguing. I won't pretend I understand WHY you want a specific time, but sure, deadline is at 16:00 (or 4 pm) on the third of January 2011. Does that mean you intend to place your vote at 15:59? :neutral:

MaHuD 说:
@Frisian,
please put the links to the nights/days in the first post
  Done.
 
I don't have time to post today sadly as I have much to do and so little time, and I see there's been a ton of posts to read since I was last here. I will catch up and post early tomorrow, but I'm glad to finally see discussions.

MaHuD 说:
Adaham, how would you explain that both "targets" can be related to both Nomad and Awdev?
There would be no reason to eat me during the night, as currently there are plenty of people suspicious of me, the only reason is Awdev and Nomad.
Magorian was immediately linked to have been eaten by Awdev by Nomad.

Your idea of me trying to kill you is utterly silly. It's far more likely they wanted you dead so the rest would lynch me up as the same group of 6 could do it now without you possibly stalling the lynch. Granted I'm talking WIFOM trying to figure out the wolves night plots, but honestly your WIFOM is like trying to think 3 steps ahead, and I don't think the wolves have some nefarious plot in mind. Killing you was the easiest way to control today's vote for a majority they would like to see pan out. If we are going to make any guess at their plans let's at least stick with Occam's razor on this one. I mean honestly why would the wolves screw up a good think they have going? They wouldn't. First thing they'd most likely do is kill everyone keeping the game from going a direction they'd want it to go. The fact NEITHER group even attempted to eat anyone voting for me should be enough proof both sides like the direction the current lynch was going.

Looking forward to posting Monday.
 
MaHuD 说:
No not at all, what I mean is that in Tavern of Terror, I think yes he was being vocal, but the attention was on me. A lot easier to be talking a lot when the attention is not towards you. Altough I do think I remember that he wasn't clear of any suspicion, there were still people suspecting him. But memory is no guarentee :razz:

Since I hosted the Tavern, I was lucky enough to see you and Ejnomad in your first games around here. Knowing your roles surely helped whilst reading you, but the overall gist of your posting styles is the same since then. Differences between good/evil roles are determined by details, not by being globally vocal.

But anyhow, this is pretty deep into meta-gaming territory and I think the whole issue can be reduced that you think of him less suspicious because he´s vocal under pressure, and I believe that it doesn´t mean anything because this is his natural (and only?) way of playing. My suspicions are not based on whether he´s agressive and vocal, but on the fact that he was repeatedly selective in his perceptions and conclusions. Yes, he plays definitely like he´s scum-hunting, but it´s those little things that make me think he´s playing false.

MaHuD 说:
Adaham, how would you explain that both "targets" can be related to both Nomad and Awdev?
There would be no reason to eat me during the night, as currently there are plenty of people suspicious of me, the only reason is Awdev and Nomad.
Magorian was immediately linked to have been eaten by Awdev by Nomad.
Eating you could have whatever reason. Maybe a wolf thought you were a special, maybe he thought you were just a dangerous player, and maybe it was after all Ejnomad that thought there was no better cover than killing the person that saved his ass the first day. AWdeV could have tried to revenge-eat you, but I think that would have been a pretty dumb move. And whilst you´re wondering that there was no reason to eat you during the night, you shouldn´t forget that (from what we can derive from the narration) somebody also deemed you important enough to protect you.

As to the whole Magorian-AWdeV theory, I guess you are referring to this:
Not really. Neither of us even voted for each other, and if there's any connection it's between AWdeV and Mag. Afterall, AWdeV was the last person to chew him out and swallow his foot over it. It is too bad I won't see Mag's post to that very post by AWdeV.
Now I read back a couple of pages, looking for whatever AWdeV´s interaction with Magorian was. In fact, it was very little, and actually the absent Magorian became a punching ball in the discussion between AWdeV and Ejnomad. Ejnomad accused AWdeV of "overinflating" his arguments against EJ, but in fact I believe the opposite is true. AWdeV has given his opinion early on in an excited manner, which is what the whole attack on him is based upon. Further on he made some mistakes about who voted who, but honestly...there were moments were I lost track of those things as well (Vote Counts once a day anybody?  :wink:).

If I take it all together, it´s quite a compilation. He thinks MaHuD was attacked to actually get a possibility to lynch Ejnomad himself. Magorian then, according to EJ, was eaten by AWdeV, based on a quite constructed idea. This nicely supports his case against the guy that was second in votes on day 1. Later in the same posts he also adresses his other favorite target, Noobscouter, where he dismantles Nod by saying his theories don´t make sense (which is globally true, btw) because the wolves want to get a lynch on Ejnomad. Last, but not least:

Votes are automatically taken off after each day so you don't need to unvote, and I've always suspected the wolves jumped on my bandwagon early. Hence my continued attacks the entire game.

Honestly, if I see this (and the big picture), I can understand why AWdeV got so drastic in his accusations. Basically what Nomad is saying is close to "who votes me is a wolf". If you think Ejnomad would be passive aggressive if in the spotlight as a wolf, I think you should rethink. I think he´s more into aggressive defense, taking the lead. This is the overall feeling I get from him. He´s very keen to stay in a dominant position.

Actually, I right now believe that Ejnomad attacked MaHuD. His whole story seems to be so perfectly laid out as to favor his case, that even though it didn´t work out for Ejnomad to silence MaHuD, he still tries to use the background story he made up.

---
Facemelter 说:
Well, I plan on doing this as well, but what are you complaining about? I think you may have agreed to this before, but as Xardob and Ej believe: Day 1 is the best day to figure out what someone's role is. Is there something on Day 1 you don't want Kronic to see? It shouldn't be much of a problem, since these posts on Day 2 thus far have been fairly short and easy reads; if Kronic falls behind, I am sure he can get caught up.
Yo, don´t try to twist my intentions. Firstly, I never advocated not to go back and re-read. As you can see above, I do so myself. But there´s a difference between just doing it, and announcing it. While there´s basically nothing wrong with an announcement, it is often abused as a means of postponing (and sometimes not delivering at all). If somebody gets to a dead end and decides to read back, fine, go and announce it. But Kronic has barely delivered anything, even though he showed how capable he was of contributing when he had some votes on him for lurking.

I personally think that if there´s a considerably intense discussion in a room, and the guy that anyway doesn´t say much comes in between and says he´ll go back to his room and take a look at the notes from yesterday, then I think there´s something not quite kosher about that guy. You say "if Kronic falls behind", now tell me...are YOU satisfied with Kronics contributions so far? Why do you feel the need to protect him? My statement to him was not "oh please, don´t read back, otherwise you´ll find something I don´t want you to see", but "where you think you are going to? Stay here and speak up!".

---

Top 3 suspects for the moment:

Ejnomad
Kronic
Facemelter

---
1 new post by Ejno, haven´t read yet
 
ejnomad07 说:
1. Your idea of me trying to kill you is utterly silly. 2. It's far more likely they wanted you dead so the rest would lynch me up as the same group of 6 could do it now without you possibly stalling the lynch. 3. Granted I'm talking WIFOM trying to figure out the wolves night plots, but honestly your WIFOM is like trying to think 3 steps ahead, and I don't think the wolves have some nefarious plot in mind.
1. No it isn´t.
2. That´s the how manyeth time you suggested all the wolves want is lynch you?
3. I don´t see how your WIFOM plots regarding the night results (and the fact it was all only to lynch you) are any less nefarious than MaHuD´s or my theories. WIFOM is okay, but only if Ejnomad decides how far it goes? That´s weak.

Killing you was the easiest way to control today's vote for a majority they would like to see pan out. If we are going to make any guess at their plans let's at least stick with Occam's razor on this one. I mean honestly why would the wolves screw up a good think they have going? They wouldn't. First thing they'd most likely do is kill everyone keeping the game from going a direction they'd want it to go. The fact NEITHER group even attempted to eat anyone voting for me should be enough proof both sides like the direction the current lynch was going.
So you are implying that if you were a wolf, you would have eaten one of the people that voted for you? But then you risk the same thing as with terrorists. Kill 1, get 5 new believers. Eating me or AWdeV would have made things very hard for you to survive the second day. Thus the best kill is the guy that seemingly saved your ass. You´d rather make those 6 people that voted for you yesterday doubt, than killing them off and risking that undecided people get on your ass.
 
FrisianDude 说:
Regendur 说:
Since you're so prudent as to use a school example, I shall use one in return. If the teacher does not state when an assignment is due, but on a day-long range and seemingly randomly chooses to end the deadline, the fault lies with the teacher.
Wait, what? In all my school-life I have never seen a specific time of the specified day of the deadline on any work to turn in. Fine though, this is not what should be argued about, and I'm not the one who ought to be arguing. I won't pretend I understand WHY you want a specific time, but sure, deadline is at 16:00 (or 4 pm) on the third of January 2011. Does that mean you intend to place your vote at 15:59? :neutral:

MaHuD 说:
@Frisian,
please put the links to the nights/days in the first post
  Done.

Sorry to jump in uninvited, but we have 'em all the time. Anyway, noting which timezone could be useful for this lot.
 
@ Frisian

You see, Frisian, in the end it costs you more time to talk to players individually if you don´t set a clear deadline at the beginning of the day. If you just decide for yourself a clear deadline before you reopen the thread and share it with us, then it´s a nobody has to think about it anymore, it´s just clear. Takes half a minute of work, but saves you many many more minutes of discussing a matter that shouldn´t be a matter of discussion.

BTW, while daily vote counts are indeed a luxury, it would still be nice to have one once every so many pages or days, even if nothing changed. I know there were 2 votes up, but I really can´t remember who voted who. And in fact it also saves you work, for if the great voting rush starts (if it ever starts), you´ll make less mistakes in your vote counts. Mistakes can always happen, but the more pages you have to look through, the greater the chance you miss something. Which means in return that people will point out their votes and you´ll have to post again and correct it (if you do so).

Sorry for being a smartass, but I just want to help. I believe it makes hosting more of a pleasure and that benefits the whole game. Cheers!
 
后退
顶部 底部