About 5500 MMR vs nearly 7000 MMR, and 2 guards and knight vs all peasants.
If it's because Jara (che I think) had mega MMR from previous seasons, then I think that's a problem?
[WBMM] Discussion & Suggestions
- Thread starter SaBo
- Start date
Users who are viewing this thread
About 5500 MMR vs nearly 7000 MMR, and 2 guards and knight vs all peasants.
If it's because Jara (che I think) had mega MMR from previous seasons, then I think that's a problem?
alot of their team's players had quite high MMR in previous seasons.OurGloriousLeader said:
About 5500 MMR vs nearly 7000 MMR, and 2 guards and knight vs all peasants.
If it's because Jara (che I think) had mega MMR from previous seasons, then I think that's a problem?
I thought the point of moving to 1000 MMR starting point was to start again with a more accurate balancing system?
The MMR from multiple seasons is taken into account. This should, overtime, give the most accurate skill representation.OurGloriousLeader said:
Ofcourse resetting MMR to 1000 is to balance it for that season, and gives the chance for the MMR to be adjusted to that player's skill level. After the season this will be added to the hidden MMR.
It's only cruel because it displays current season MMR without any type of indication that you have hidden mmr
Hidden MMR is there to eliminate the need of having 2 weeks of random unbalanced matches at the beginning of every season. The MMR you gain or lose during that season will be taken into account as part of the hidden MMR for the next season just for balancing purposes.
KaneMaB said:
I understand kind of, but hypothetically there is Anubis with a hidden MMR of 8000, its much harder to gain mmr and therfore reaching the leaderboard then someone who doesnt play that much. I think the displayed MMR should kind of represent your "skill" aka your total mmr, but thats just my take i guess. Other games like dota do a calibration each season where your mmr changes are much steeper, first match the most second a bit less and finally after 10 you get to the normal mmr distribution, just wanted to know if you thought about that
To be honest, the MMR system is mainly based off how many matches you're playing. There's plenty of people within the top 25 who's known for not being that good and the MMR has solely come from playtime. You'll probably get better match-ups by randomising the teams but keeping the MMR to show wins etc. I really dislike logging in and the 3k MMR player is some mediocre player whilst they have a pro player at 2k MMR, we're going to lose. Scrap the MMR system, the better players in the scene don't sweat WBMM so normally have far less MMR than the others. Make it randomised.
There is no evidence that there will be better equaziled teams with randomising. At least they are attempting to make it balanced. Also as a reminder;
ssalih said:You won't be able to find the perfect mmr system with the amount of people playing it anyway. Not even mentioning the cheaters
Your idea is good Irsman yet you pretty much brought all the major flaws to it yourself. Having MMR pools would make the system more efficient yet it would drastically increase the waiting time, which would then become one of the major points of contention in people's complains. Endless circle really.
As you said it so well yourself, there is no perfect MMR system to be found for WBMM with such a small community. Not sure why people would care for whoever ends up at the top of the ladder at each season nor if the players with the highest MMR accurately represent the best players of the community. Just take it for what it is, a well-designed and useful tool to play competitive warband in a semi-organized way and with a very relative balance, nothing more.
As you said it so well yourself, there is no perfect MMR system to be found for WBMM with such a small community. Not sure why people would care for whoever ends up at the top of the ladder at each season nor if the players with the highest MMR accurately represent the best players of the community. Just take it for what it is, a well-designed and useful tool to play competitive warband in a semi-organized way and with a very relative balance, nothing more.
yeah well maybe u should donate then??
idk about u but mynes is hundreds of euros in the minus over this already and i dont think if i were him id be very willing to embrace the na community when theyre even incapable of running a single tournament and are quite obviously a dead scene
idk about u but mynes is hundreds of euros in the minus over this already and i dont think if i were him id be very willing to embrace the na community when theyre even incapable of running a single tournament and are quite obviously a dead scene
I guess MYNES will also have to create a separate leaderboard for the NA version, MYNES will also need non-limited access to the servers which have been donated to be able to restart, add files and edit anything needed. This kind of stuff takes time, if you want it faster then create it yourself I guess? if not give MYNES time
