Surkan said:People who have been banned from other modules for aimbot, people who have questionable performance and go around asking people how to install dlls๖Kern said:Everyone accepted.
We reached 16 teams, that means the sign-ups are closed.
Surkan said:Do you plan on doing anything against known cheaters entering the tournament?
Define known?
Yes, I do.
Surkan said:
WarhammerR said:Tbh, can't this tournament be a bit longer+let's allow every team to play, not only 16 teams. Community is getting smaller and smaller so I don't think excluding anyone from playing is good decision. I mean we will play this in 3 weeks, then we gonna wait same amount of time(probs even more) for next one. 4-6 weeks of playing would be better imo and I have to say I like idea of playing 2 matches per week in early stage of tournament.
Surkan said:can we replace field by the river with an actual map? it's unplayable with 180s
๖Kern said:We'll announce our decision concerning some people soon™
Apollo~ said:๖Kern said:We'll announce our decision concerning some people soon™
Since you announced the qualifiers, can you now announce the people who are not allowed to play due to being caught red handed using cheats?
? Rey said:Why wouldn’t you allow Anubis record 3-4 sets of each match? I do not see any harm in him playing if he can provide you with full recording of his gameplay.
Just make it sctrict: Any video editing, failure to upload recordings in timely manner will result in a full time ban.
Just give a man way to actually show that he might not be as guilty as people think he is. Nothing wrong with giving a chance while being extra careful
Bull****. First of all theres no way he can cheat while recording his footage, anyone would be able to tell. What information could you POSSIBLE have that gives you a 99% certainty?๖Kern said:? Rey said:Why wouldn’t you allow Anubis record 3-4 sets of each match? I do not see any harm in him playing if he can provide you with full recording of his gameplay.
Just make it sctrict: Any video editing, failure to upload recordings in timely manner will result in a full time ban.
Just give a man way to actually show that he might not be as guilty as people think he is. Nothing wrong with giving a chance while being extra careful
We've actually thought about that as a first outcome. Thing is, that we are 99% sure he is guilty. We've been given a lot of information from Alecks and Menethil also agreed that the gifs provided clearly show he is cheating. Even if he wouldn't use the aimbot he has, I am fairly sure that the only current (and paid) cheat also has Wallhack implemented. The only thing that would lift the suspension would be implementing a client sided anti-cheat that would help with detecting 3rd party software, this thing is actually doable but it will probably be widely undesirable.
Greedalicious said:Saw him playing and told him to record.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NTv1GLeS82E&feature=youtu.be
He flicks his hands here too. With high sensitivity and dpi it might look sketchy but its how he plays, and he plays quite well too. As Alecks said hes a good archer. 5 years in WFAS, 1300 hours on native, having played a lot recently, why wouldnt he be legit? Im not convinced by the gifs and definitly dont think theyre undeniable, so lets take a look at them.
https://i.gyazo.com/bf1985701f917ab8cc5e398acb68e692.gif
He tracks a cav towards the right side, then his mouse flicks to a target on the left.
What happened there? Well lets assume its aimbotting.
Why would the aimbot fly to the target far left of the screen? Hes tracking the target in the middle, switches to the one on the right, then flies to the left. Why switch targets like that?
My opinion:
You can basically see the way he thinks. He aims at the middle horse first because thats what he see's first, he reacts to the cav on the right as it moves towards him,probably playing in first person so its less vision. He then spots the third cav crash into his teammate and is reared, and reacts to shoot it. It doesnt show the arrow being released, I'm guessing it missed? This proves nothing. Most archers would do the same.
https://i.gyazo.com/f5152ffadc9495de5a40ab91f11c1017.gif
It took a long time to see what this is for, Its the movement to the right near the end I assume? That just proves he has a mouse.
https://i.gyazo.com/93438f1fc7ea079535a5ec81e8928635.mp4
Im guessing the proof here is the shake he does. Also doesnt prove anything, its just high sensitivity and the angle doesnt show any targets, I've never seen an autobot do that, what is it trying to spot there?
There was also a 12 minute video but I didnt add that, not sure why it was used as proof, it didnt show anything sketchy. I'll link it though.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6VUTjeekPEo&t=56s
https://i.gyazo.com/19033ac093b1590da3d7b42934a30e8e.gif
Last gif, and honestly this was abit sketchy to me too, and I still cant fully disprove it. The sketchty part is the headshot but from a top view, the head is obviously the biggest target to hit, so its not that hard. If you watch how he plays it shows how he usually plays, I'm pretty sure this can be replicated, I just havent had the time.
I dont see how this is evidence enough to perma ban someone.
Greedalicious said: